Tagged: 

Viewing 6 posts - 7 through 12 (of 35 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    Thank you.

    Would that then mean pars fracture are removed and lamina is left in free floating ?

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    The inferior facets of L5 (along with the entire lamina) are “disconnected” from the pedicles of L5 by the bilateral pars fractures. When doing a “minimally invasive” approach, you do not have access to the center of the spine. The surgeon can remove the free-floating facets from the free-floating lamina but cannot remove the entire lamina as this approach from both sides will not allow access to the entire lamina. This then prevents access to removing the entire free-floating lamina-facet complex and the quantity of bone graft is significantly diminished.

    As I have said before, the minimally invasive approach is more of a marketing tool. It is not minimally invasive as if you add up the length of the incisions and the dissection, the incision for “minimally invasive surgery” is almost twice as long as a minimally open procedure with a lesser success rate. Nonetheless, a good MIS surgeon can have a good result.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    Thank you

    Having a MIS TLIF with smaller retractable cage and no posterolateral fusion doesn’t sound like a good risk to take for the first surgery. Some MIS surgeons will use similar boomerang cage as you and are able to do posterolateral fusion. The surgeon I am speaking to does not.

    When surgeons “sell” this MIS technique they are comparing it to the typical 4-6 inch incision and muscle stripping that goes along with open TLIF. The selling point is no muscle stripping, less pain, faster recovery and they have tracked loss of blood.

    Most spine surgeons do not operate through a small incision like yourself for open TLIF. As a matter of fact, none of them do!

    You are the best ! Thank you.

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    Many of the TLIF surgeons I know use this minimally invasive central incision. The comparisons by the MIS crowd use the old 8-12 inch incision statistics to “prove their point”. There is significant muscle stripping with the MIS technique (if they perform posterolateral fusions) as the only way bone will fuse is with exposure and grafting. If there is no stripping, how do they perform decompressions? The muscles that attach segment to segment attach along the lamina. In addition, these muscles will have no function after fusion. Ask yourself why they need to be preserved if they will have no function after fusion surgery.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    Thank you.

    The MIS surgeons have told me that the central incision of 4-6 inches strips muscles off bone.

    How would two arthroscopic incisions through a tube on either side of spine cause muscle stripping ? Perhaps this only applies to MIS TLIF without posterolateral fusion.

    I have honestly looked high and low in my area. Any surgeon that does open TLIF makes a 4-6 inch incision to get wide enough for posterolateral fusion and pedicle placement.

    They say the difference between 2 inch incision and 5-6 inch incision really has no factor long term; it just effect the length of the recovery time, which could end up being a full year.

    If you know of anyone in the Northeast that has similar method to your own please let me know. I need to stay close to home for this surgery unfortunately.

    Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    FORGOT TO ASK….

    If MIS TLIF does not fuse how do you fix it ? Do you replace cage and do posterolateral fusion ?

    I was reading some of your past comments on leaving cartilage behind and not fully clearing endplate and nucleus out of disc space; I suppose if I were to ask my surgeon about this they would get offended and think I was overanalyzing this ?

Viewing 6 posts - 7 through 12 (of 35 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.