Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 65 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Hi Dr Corenman

    My PT had the same question, why no mention of a fusion? That is concerning. My Pain management doctor was concerned and unclear as to the mention of “soft tissue intensity” issues. He doesn’t understand what the radiologist is trying to communicate. The past few weeks the lower back from left to right is quite painful and stiff, despite being quite active. I have been experiencing way more issues with leg pain. to fill in some blanks, I have had 2 RFA’s L4-L5, and L3-L4, both of which helped. Logic would dictate that these procedures would no longer be required after this surgery. I was warned that the L3-L4 may have issues. I simply had no options due to being in so much pain and couldnt function. Is it possible the scar tissue is an issue? Do I have options having that removed? If i need an additional surgery on L3-L4 what should I expect considering the revisions? Thanks again….!!

    Steve

    sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Correction, this is a CATSCAN.

    sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Hi Dr Corenman

    Been awhile since I posted my recovery. Been almost a year since my revision L4/S1 surgery. Some issues, nothing horrific. slow recovery but still way better than before the procedure. This is the latest MRI. Any suggestions or questions when I meet with the surgeon in May? Thank you so much for all the help! Steven
    Impression

    IMPRESSION:

    Prior laminectomy at the L4 and L5 levels. Prior anterior and posterior fusion at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. No evidence of loosening of the hardware.

    L3-4: Circumferential bulging of the disc annulus, facet arthropathy, and ligamentum flavum prominence causing mild to moderate canal and bilateral lateral recess stenosis. Stable superimposed small left intraforaminal disc herniation causing flattening of the exiting left L3 nerve root.

    L5-S1: Postoperative changes are noted. Prominent left paracentral and left intraforaminal soft tissue density, the extent of which has increased compared with the soft tissue intensity on the MRI lumbar spine dated March 8, 2017. If clinically indicated, contrast-enhanced CT or contrast-enhanced MR imaging with attention to the L5-S1 level is recommended for further evaluation.
    Narrative

    CLINICAL INDICATION: Low back pain. Prior lumbar spine fusion surgery.

    TECHNIQUE: CT of the lumbar spine was performed without the administration of intravenous contrast, according to standard protocol using multidetector helical technique. Sagittal and coronal reformations were obtained.

    COMPARISON: MRI lumbar spine dated March 8, 2017.

    FINDINGS:
    The lumbar lordosis is maintained. There is a mild levoscoliosis. There is no fracture or cortical destruction. No focal suspicious osseous lesions are noted. No prevertebral mass is seen.

    Prior anterior and posterior fusion at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels is seen. Prior laminectomy at the L4 and L5 levels is seen. Transpedicle screws in L4, L5, and S1 are noted. The left-sided screw in S1 extends 2 mm beyond the anterior cortical margin of S1. Paravertebral rods are noted. Interbody cage placement at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels is noted. Dorsolateral bone graft at the L4-L5 level bilaterally is seen. There is no evidence of loosening of the hardware. Partial osseous integration is seen. Postoperative granulation tissue is seen. Postoperative changes in the left iliac bone are noted. There is a focus of increased CT density in the left iliac bone without cortical destruction or pathologic soft tissue mass; differential diagnosis includes, among others, focal fibrous dysplasia and Paget disease.

    EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL LEVELS DEMONSTRATES:
    L1-2: No significant canal or neural foraminal stenosis.

    L2-3: No significant canal or neural foraminal stenosis.

    L3-4: Circumferential bulging of the disc annulus, facet arthropathy, and ligamentum flavum prominence causing mild to moderate canal and bilateral lateral recess stenosis. Stable superimposed small left intraforaminal disc herniation causing flattening of the exiting left L3 nerve root.

    L4-5: Postoperative changes are noted. No significant canal or neural foraminal stenosis.

    L5-S1: Postoperative changes are noted. Prominent left paracentral and left intraforaminal soft tissue density, the extent of which has increased compared with the soft tissue intensity on the MRI lumbar spine dated March 8, 2017. If clinically indicated, contrast-enhanced CT or contrast-enhanced MR imaging with attention to the L5-S1 level is recommended for further evaluation.

    sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Hello Dr Corenman

    Just checking in with you and the forum. These are the latest xrays from my l4-s1 revision TLIF
    Study Result
    Impression

    IMPRESSION:

    Status post L4-S1 posterior and anterior column fusion with further incorporation of the dorsolateral L4-5 bone graft and no evidence of hardware failure.

    There is no subluxation, normal alignment with neutral, flexion, and extension images.
    Narrative

    History: Lumbosacral spinal fusion follow-up

    Technique: XR LUMBAR SPINE AP AND LATERAL WITH FLEXION AND EXTENSION 4 VIEWS

    Comparison: 8/15/2017 lumbar spine radiographs

    Findings:

    There has been posterior spinal rod and pedicle screw fusion from L4 through S1. The pedicle screws are intact with no evidence of pathologic surrounding lucency. The spinal rods are intact. There is no subluxation, normal alignment with neutral, flexion, and extension images.

    Dorsolateral bone graft is visible at L4-5 bilaterally. It appears to have undergone further coalescence since the prior examination.

    There has been interbody cage placement at L4-5 and L5-S1. There is bone graft within the L4-5 interspace, visible anterior and to the right of midline without definite incorporation into the adjacent vertebral bodies. The L5-S1 interbody graft appears to have resorbed.

    There is mild intervertebral disc height narrowing at L3-4. L1-2 and L2-3 disc height is preserved. There is no fracture. There are no osseous destructive lesions.

    I am post op 6 months. I still some issues, and occasional groin pain, nothing like previous to the surgery.

    sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Dear Dr Corenman

    Update on my surgery

    Summary: I had a Open Tlif revision, L4-S1 (l5/s1 was new). The surgeon found “No Fusion whatsoever. Severe compression at the L5 level. He also decompressed the L3 without a fusion. I received excellent care and spent 7 days in the hospital due to severe pain and excessive drainage. The first 2 days there was a discussion with the doctors regarding being sent to a facility since I was unable to move my legs without assistance. I was very adamant in PT and never allowed the staff to miss sessions. Things improved. Constipation was a severe issue. At some point I asked for “Movantik” for the issue which did help. Still hospitals “Do Not” give the correct meds to help the patients. Patients must be there own doctors. I have been home for about 3 months. Recovery has been a challenge but I am improving quite nicely. I am fortunate to be working from home until I’m strong enough to travel to my office. To anyone going for such a surgery, beware that it is difficult and exhausting. Quite different that a MI operation. The older one is the greater the challenge. Go for PT with a therapist with extensive spine experience. My PT started in house and after 6 weeks started in office therapy. One very important finding regarding avoiding nausea post op. I was given a scopmaline patch. I was Rx it for almost 4 weeks due to other meds causing nausea(even Tylenol). The withdrawal from this drug is horrific!. Avoid it if you can, find alternate treatment. I found not doctors, PA, Nurses, and remarkably Pharmacist were aware of the withdrawal effects. My pain management doctor was aware and said he never Rxs med. Im sorry for the long report. The journey continues, 60-70% of my pain has been relieved. I hope it continues. Thank you Dr C for all your help!

    Steve

    sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Hi Dr. Corenman

    The doctors (as a team) are now quite confident that the source of the hip pain is coming from the back. I went through presurgical testing, and was sent for a neuro consult as per the surgeon. Very thorough exam. Thank goodness no nerve damage, the doctor said mechanical in nature. Any last minute instructions?

    Thank You!

    Steve

    ps: The procedure will be an open revision TLIF L4 through S1

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 65 total)