Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • epqe17
    Member
    Post count: 4

    As I am not in the immediate area are there any further diagnostic tests or other recommendations you may have for me to ask for with my network of local doctors?

    epqe17
    Member
    Post count: 4

    Dr. Corenman,

    What you have said makes a great deal of sense, however, my body is reacting completely the opposite way. As I lean forward to attempt to walk more vertically there is no pain, however, I am forced (it feels as if my paraspinal muscles are firing to force me backward) backward to this 20 degree off normal position (there is no lean left or right – just straight backward). After my body has been forced to this position I feel pain as I walk. I can lean forward to alleviate the pain, but my body forces me back to the painful position.

    I have one additional image (Image 1) that can be seen in my previous link that I just added (I hope you can look at it).

    This shows a “mass” in the anterior space of what remains of the disc (within the broken end plate area) and my working theory is that the L5-S1 disc remnants have created a more solid diametrical mass and I can no longer overcome this “obstruction” to stand up straight. As I stated earlier I can bend over and touch my toes without pain so the working antalgic theory doesn’t make sense (there is no pain bending forward).

    Have you ever seen anything like this before?

    Thanks for your time as you have offered more to me in this brief summary than all 7 previous orthopedic surgeons combined.

    epqe17
    Member
    Post count: 4

    My images can be found at https://docs.google.com/present
    To answer your specific questions:

    1. My standing lateral X-ray indicates decreased disk height at L5-S1 and significant osteophye growth. T11-T12 and T12-L1 have Schmorl’s nodes and reduced disk height.

    2. The specific angles have not been calculated, but you should know that the pain actually occurs after the extension posturing occurs (not before). My body isn’t reaching the extension posturing due to pain, but it is created after extension. As I try to straighten, my body is forced back to extension and more pain.

    3. Flexion/extension xrays are included in the link.

    4. I do not have a scoliogram X-Ray, but I do not have any signficiant scoliosis.

    What I do want to provide you is the actual MRI report and CT Scan report text:

    MRI:

    FINDINGS:
    There is no abnormal signal evident to suggest fracture. The pars interarticular are intact.

    T12/L1:Small anterior disc bulge is evident with disc space narrowing and disc desiccation. There is no central canal stenosis or neuroforaminal narrowing.

    L1/2: There is no disc bulge or protrusion. There is no central canal stenosis or neuroforaminal narrowing. The facet joints are preserved.

    L2/3: There is no disc bulge or protrusion. There is no central canal stenosis or neuroforaminal narrowing. The facet joints are preserved.

    L3/4:Disc desiccation is evident with high signal in the 6 o’clock position of the annulus reflecting an annular tear. Small superimposed disc protrusion with minimal inferior extrusion is evident that deforms the ventral thecal sac without central canal stenosis. There is no neuroforaminal narrowing. Minimal left facet arthropathy is evident.

    L4/5: Disc desiccation is evident with diffuse disc bulge symmetric to the left extending into the left neuroforamen. The disc bulge causes flattening of the thecal sac without central canal stenosis. Mild bilateral facet arthropathy is evident. All this causes bilateral neuroforaminal narrowing, mild on the left and minimal on the right.

    LS/S1:Diffuse disc bulge is evident asymmetric to the left extending into the left neuroforamen. Small superimposed central disc protrusion is evident. Bilateral facet arthropathy is identified. Prominent disc space narrowing with endplate Modic change is noted. Endplate osteophytes are appreciated. The disc bulge, endplate osteophytes and facet arthropathy cause bilateral neuroforaminal narrowing, moderate to severe on the left and moderate on the right. The disc bulge and endplate osteophytes contact the exiting/exited nerve roots.

    The paraspinal soft tissues are grossly unremarkable.

    IMPRESSION:

    1. T12/L1: Small anterior disc bulge

    2. T12/L1, L1/2, L2/3 and L3/4: No central canal stenosis. No neuroforamlnal narrowing.

    3. L3/4; Disc protrusion. Minimal Inferior disc extrusion. Annular tear.

    4. L4/5; Disc bulge asymmetric to left Into left neuroforamen. No central canal stenosis. Bilateral neuroforaminal narrowing, mild on the left and minimal on the right.

    5. L5/S1: Diffuse disc bulge asymmetric to left into left neuroforamen. Central disc protrusion. Bilateral neuroforaminal narrowing, moderate to severe on the left and moderate on the right. Contact exiting/exited bilateral L5 nerve roots.

    CT SCAN:

    -There is minimal retrolistliesis of L5 on Sl.
    -The vertebral bodies are normal in height.
    -Schmorl’s nodes are seen at Tll and Tl2 levels.
    -There is reduction in disc space at T11-TI2, Tl2-L1 and L5-S1 levels.
    -There is contiguous endplate irregularity with vacuum phenomenon in the disk at L5-S1 level.
    -T11-T12, T12-L1, L1-L2,and L2-L3 levels: Mild bilateral facet hypertrophy is seen. There is also mild bilateral neural foraminal narrowing at T11-T12 level.
    -L3-L4 level: There is a disc bulge with a bilateral facet hypertrophy and mild canal stenosis.
    -L4-L5 level: There is a disc bulge with a bilateral facet hypertrophy causing mild canal stenosis and mild narrowing of bilateral central foramen.
    -Pre and paravertebral soft tissue is normal.
    -Spina bifida is seen at S1 level.
    -There is evidence of sclerotic lesion likely a bony island.
    IMPRESSION:
    -Multilevel degenerative changes seen in the lower thoracic and lumbar spine, as described above.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)