Tagged: 

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    I spoke to yet another surgeon today that says he is moving away from boomerang style cage for TLIF because there are no holes in it which help integrate fusion on the sides of the cage.

    He said he now uses a new tritanium cage (light titanium) that is not shaped as a boomerang, but has holes on the sides to help with fusion. Surgeon did say that he just started using this cage and does use BMP in front of spine, which he believes will be shielded from the spinal canal with this new cage?

    This surgeon also said he very rarely see bones spurs under pars once the pars fracture is removed ?

    1.) Have you heard of this new tri-tanium cage and is it safe to use with BMP in the front ?

    2.) What dose of BMP do you use in front and on the sides ?

    2.) Are there always bone spurs underneath pars fracture ?

    Thank you

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    This cage is a more porous metal cage that does have more and larger holes in the side of the cage. Any cage is really just a spacer to hold the two vertebral endplates apart when the fusion occurs. I personally don’t like metal cages as these are not radiolucent (you can see through them with an X-ray). This makes it harder to see with a standard X-ray if the fusion is taking place. Nonetheless, there is nothing wrong with these types of cages.

    If the BMP is in the cage, it is my opinion that the cage does not shield the nerve from BMP.

    The dose of BMP ranges from 1.5 mg to 2 mg depending upon the size of the disc space. I use the rest on the sides of the vertebral body where the facets are located (normally 2.5 mg).

    If there is an isthmic spondylolisthesis present (pars fractures with slip), there is almost always pedicle spurs that are near or compressing the nerve root.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    Thank you and sorry to drill down to such detail. I find this interesting. I guess there would seem to be some advantage with fusion if bone can grow out of the sides as well at top and bottom ?

    The surgeon does not put BMP in the cage, rather he puts BMP in front of the disc space the same way you do and then packs bone in front of the cage.

    Question: Will this tri-tanium cage (even though it is not boomerang shape) still shield the BMP from traveling to the spinal cord ? It would seem like the boomerang shape would do a better job of shielding the BMP.

    Will the holes in cage provide benefit to fusion process on the sides ?

    Have you every seen one on of these cages I am referring to? I believe it is made by stryker and just came on to the market.

    Please let me know your thoughts. the surgeon will use either cage.

    Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    P.S. – new cage is made out of light titanium and from what I understand is more of a rectangular shape…

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    If the BMP is placed in the front of the disc space and the cage has no BMP in it, there is a better chance that the cage can shield the nerve from the BMP. You are correct in that a rectangular cage is typically placed obliquely into the disc space so that it doesn’t work as well as the boomerang to shield the BMP from the canal. The “side holes” in the cage might create more surface area to help fusion but I would not bet on that as I have a 98-99% fusion rate with the current boomerang cage.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    Tritanium PL posterior lumbar cage – this is the name of it, was just released march 4. Apparently, the cage is manufactured with a 3D printer. Larger lateral windows on the side to monitor fusion process.

    My question is, how can you tell if bone is fusing through windows on the side of the cage ?

    I will probably just ask for the boomerang cage, seeems to make more sense with your method in shielding the BMP.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.