Viewing 6 posts - 37 through 42 (of 76 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    MBBs (medial bench blocks-the nerves that supply the facets) generally have a 70% chance of radio-frequency ablation success. Unfortunately, you are on the 30% side of that equation.

    A two level fusion is robust enough to allow most activities except contact sports. Based upon a 2mm slip of C3-4 and C4-5. you could possibly develop a degenerative spondylolisthesis at each level (which is interesting as the ADRs are designed to prevent those levels from wearing out which the ADRs obviously did not prevent). It is not something you need to worry about.

    You can go back to light jogging and most outdoor sports after a 2 level ACDF.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    BRONCOFAN1
    Participant
    Post count: 42

    Hi Dr Corenman,

    My surgeon is recommending a posterior fusion instead of attempting to revise these Mobi C devices to an ACDF. How do you feel about that as an option?

    Thanks,
    Kevin

    BRONCOFAN1
    Participant
    Post count: 42

    Hi Dr. Corenman,

    Subsequent to posting this, I did a little bit of research. A posterior fusion seems like an inferior construct that would leave the non-MRI compatible, and no longer useful, artificial disc in place. It also doesn’t seem like it should be all that difficult to dig out a Mobi-C – it’s going to be 5-6 months old so I’m sure it’s well attached to the bone, but I just really don’t think a posterior fusion is the way to go.

    Surgeon thinks I should wait to see if my symptoms improve, but I don’t see the point. With the facets being overloaded, it seems that it would take many years for improvement as you’d need facet bone spurs to restrict motion, with a good chance that relief never occurs in the presence of the permanently mobile ADR and also a good possibility that bone spurring causes additional problems. I certainly have not seen any notable improvement in the 4 months since the surgery, with the exception of some relief from an RFA.

    Would appreciate your thoughts as always!

    Thanks,
    Kevin

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    A posterior fusion is the wrong surgery for failed ADRs in the cervical spine. They need to be removed and converted into ACDFs. It is not hard to do.

    There is no penalty for waiting other than continuing pain.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    BRONCOFAN1
    Participant
    Post count: 42

    Hi Dr Corenman,

    Explantation and revision to ACDF scheduled in a couple of weeks. While there’s no penalty for waiting, I can tell based on the feedback from my neck that there will also be no benefit! Plus the pain is a pretty hefty penalty!

    I want to say again that I’d still be spinning my wheels without your help, so thanks so much!

    Will let the forum know how it goes, although I may have some questions about the surgical plan after I go over it in details. I’m thinking autograft for sure, beyond that I hear using the shortest titanium plate that works is important for reducing adjacent segment issues. Any other key things you would suggest I ask about for an ADR revision?

    Thanks,
    Kevin

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    These artificial discs are easy to remove. Unfortunately, I have had to revise many that were implanted for the wrong reasons so I have some experience in this. These ADRs have minimal ingrowth and will pop out levering with a small osteotome (chisel) underneath the front edge of the implant.

    Yes, autograft is the way to go as this is a revision and you want the best chance for solid fusion. Yes, the shortest titanium plate that spans the segments is important.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
Viewing 6 posts - 37 through 42 (of 76 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.