Viewing 5 posts - 7 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Vin
    Participant
    Post count: 11

    Hi again Doctor!

    So I have the results of the MRI / CT Scan. It seems that I have a sequestered piece of disc at the postoperative level (l5 s1) that is within close proximity but inferior to S2. (Right side). That is paraphrased off memory as I do not have the report in front of me atm. I will post word for word later tonight and perhaps you can break it down for me.

    My neurosurgeon bumped me up when I called with this report from the hospital so I see him early next week.

    I suppose a microdiscectomy revision will likely be in order.

    What is your thought on Microdisectomy revisions? I have read conflicting opinions. Some surgeons opt to go straight to fusion to avoid another possibly failed microdiscectomy and thus avoiding accumulation of fibrosis, as this could potentially end up being 3 surgeries (ie. 2 failed microdiscectomy and then a l5 s1 fusion).

    Other Doctors say to always try 2 Microdisectomy before going to a much more invasive fusion and do not mention much at all in regards to the accumulation of scar tissue with a worst case scenario 3 surgeries.

    1. What is the successful outcome percentages of Microdiscectomy revision surgery? Does the reherniation rate increase from the 10% chance of reherniation with the first Microdiscectomy procedure? Or is it still 10% chance with revision surgery?

    2. What are your thoughts on going straight to fusion vs microdiscectomy revision?

    3. With either surgery, do you ever have patients wear braces? I also read mixed opinions, some Doctors swear by them to keep the patient conscious of no BLTing…others say it restricts natural motion/ movement and increases chances of significant fibrosis.

    Any input or insight is welcome and very much appreciated!

    I will of course ask my surgeon these questions but also have a high regard for your opinion.

    Thanks!

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    Generally, a fusion is not warranted with a recurrent disc herniation. The surgery to revise the recurrent herniation is slightly more technically orientated than the first but nonetheless-not that hard.

    Now if the pain after the microdisectomy is related to the disc itself and not the recurrent herniation (lower back pain that does not radiate to the side of the recurrent herniation), a fusion work-up might be warranted.

    Reherniation rate after the first herniation is 10%.

    I always have my patents wear a soft corset brace for the first 4-6 weeks whether it is a fusion or a decompression. I think the brace reminds the patient not to “BLT”. The brace slightly restricts natural motion which is what you want and does not promote fibrosis.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Vin
    Participant
    Post count: 11

    Hi, great thanks a lot for the info.

    Is the back brace you use similar to this?

    Thanks.

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    The brace I use is somewhat more substantial than that brace but the idea is the same.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Vin
    Participant
    Post count: 11

    Hi Dr. Corenman,

    Can you please let me know your thoughts on my CT Scan / MRI Reports overall and also let me know if anything stands out as reason to why I would be getting numbness / sciatica in both legs and feet along with transient numbness in genital / rectum area as well as lower back pain across my entire lower back, both right and left sided?

    Thanks again very much. I truly appreciate your responses and insight.

    As per my CT Scan Report.

    Findings:

    The evidence of surgical intervention at lumbosacral level is noted with disk space narrowing and vacuum phenomenon. Limited right sided laminectomy.

    Abnormal soft tissue density is seen occupying the right anterolateral aspect of the spinal canal contiguous with the residual, degenerate disk, obliterating the fat surrounding the right S1 nerve root.

    Indentation of the anterior aspect of the dura at and below the level of the disk for about 18mm from presumed sequestered residual disk / postoperative reaction.

    The left S1 nerve root is spared and nothing significant shown at the more superior levels. The degree of soft tissue reaction is consistent with the intervention with no particular concerns of infection.

    *Postoperative sequestered disk material / haematoma / granulation tissue on the right side at the site of intervention obliterating the space around ipsilateral S1 nerve root and indenting the anterior aspect of the theca but not critically so. The left S1 nerve root is spared.

    Given the clinical concern and to more precisely depict the extent of spinal canal compromise arrangements are in place for urgent MR scan.

    As per MRI Report

    Findings:

    The MR scan confirms CT findings of abnormal sequestered disk material indenting the right anterolateral aspect of the theca at the operated level (lumbosacral) with extension inferiorly almost to the level of S2.

    *The MRI scan has been reassuring and excluded the necessity for critical urgent decompression surgery. However, neurosurgical consult should be planned as soon as possible.

Viewing 5 posts - 7 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.