Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • tkeon168
    Member
    Post count: 3

    Dr. Corenman,

    We did discuss both C4-5 and C7-T1 during the appointment. He did not feel that fusion of either level was warranted at this time. The canal width at c4-5 was over 15mm with at least 2mm of CSF completely surrounding the cord at that level. He did mention the possibility that a problem could develop in the future at either level that would require another surgical intervention.

    Do you feel I need to revisit this topic with him prior to the surgery? Would my age (mid-30s) play at all into the decision making process?

    tkeon168
    Member
    Post count: 3

    Dr. Corenman,

    Met with the Neurosurgeon today who reviewed my symptoms and imaging. He noted that a combination of the disk at c5-c6 along with a bone spur at c6 are causing compression of the spinal cord with an AP diameter of less then 7mm near the bone spur and complete absence of CSF anterior or posterior at that level with other areas around the disk at about 8mm with very little CSF showing.

    It is of note, that my neurological symptoms (pulses, tingling, burning) have diminished since I stopped PT and the exercises, which had included extension exercises for both the back and the neck to loosen the muscles since PT was started before the Cervical MRI. It seems by doing the extensions of the neck, I was putting even more pressure on the already compressed spinal cord.

    He recommended a c5-6-7 ACDF and it has been scheduled in about 4 weeks, but could be done sooner if symptoms progress during that time (as they did with the PT exercises). Does this sound like a reasonable approach based on the data given in the MRI and by the surgeon? He did review all of the images with me and showed me the areas of concern and explained why the surgery was needed to correct the issues versus other non-surgical options.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)