Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Incomplete Spinal Fusion #21523
Hi Dr Corenman
As suggested, I did have the myelogram. These are the results(will only include the pertinent lines):
L3-L4: Step retrolisthessis of L3, mild bilateral foraminal bulges greater on the left, no herniations. The roots are intact, mild central canal narrowing in extension, normal in neutral, intact posterial element
L4-L5: Intact instrumentation, no angulation in flexion and in extension, fused left and right sided interbody fusion, minimal normal bilateral postoperative recess scarring, patent canal, foramina
L5-S1: Mild diffuse bulge, clear recesses and canal, patent foramina, normal alignment, intact posterior elements, no arachnoid adhesion
Findings
Vertebra: The L4-L5 instrumentation is intact. There is a step retrolisthesis of L3. The remaining AP alignment above and below the fusion is intact in flexion in extension. heights , shape and density are intact.
Discs: There is osseous fusion of the right portion of the intervertebral cage. There is no gaseous change within the residula disc to indicate motion. There is ild bilatereal foraminal L3-4 bulge on the left and mild diffuse L5-S1 bulge. The remainder of the disc are normal in size, shape, and height, and density.
Canal: Mild L3-4 central canal narrowing in extension, normal in neutral, the contained nerves and conus are normal. Thoracis cord and canal are intact.
Foramina: Minimal narrowing of the L3-L4 Foramina due to bulge, the roots and ganglia are intact
Lateral recesses: The l4/4 appear fused. The facets and lamina above and below the fusion are intact. The pedicles, and sacrums are intact
Soft Tissue: Normal diameter aorta bifurcates at L3/4, the IVC at L4/5, normal postoperative changes in the dorsal musculature, the rest are intact. The plexus is clear.
Sorry for the repetition. I didn’t want to miss anything. Thank you again for all your patience.
Just so all are aware, the left leg weakness(as per my PT) and lower back pain and pressure continue with some progression.
Steve
in reply to: Incomplete Spinal Fusion #21406Hi Dr. Corenman
Sorry for any confusion. I was referring to the Myelogram. The surgeon was quite insistent that it is done prior to a CT Bone Scan. My concern was the possible side effects of the Myelogram. At this juncture I am quite certain that I will require some sort of revision surgery. Though the surgeon feels that the revision wont be as intense since the rods and screws are in good shape and holding “all” open.
Will continue to keep the forum up to date
Thanks
Steve
in reply to: Incomplete Spinal Fusion #21361Thank you again Dr Corenman. Can you provide any advice on the procedure to avoid issues? I will continue keeping the forum up to date.
Thanks
Steve
in reply to: Incomplete Spinal Fusion #21325Hi Dr. Corenman
I recently saw my orthopedic surgeon to discuss my outstanding issues. He indicated that based on my symptoms(weakness in my left leg, numbness and tingling in the left foot, back pressure in the surgical site), and from the CAT Scan, there is only a partial fusion on facet joints. No additional fusion in and around the L4 area. The doctor feels the best next step is to do a Mylegram. to say the least, I am not happy at all having that test. Prior to the surgery it was suggested, though the doctor went with a Bone Scan.
Is this the right thing to do? This is a very severe invasive test. Would a bone scan accomplish the same thing? He did say that if i need additional surgery, it would be easier and only the spacer would be removed and replaced with excessive bone material. The whole process is becoming very daunting.
Again, thank you for your patience and help
Steve
in reply to: Incomplete Spinal Fusion #21226Hi Dr C, just an update
I did have the SI pain block, not a great response. A tad better, but the stiffness and weak and dull leg pain is still persistent. My pain doctor said if the procedure fails all that’s left is a visit to my surgeon.
STEVE
in reply to: Incomplete Spinal Fusion #21201Hi Dr Corenman
I had another meeting with my Pain doctor and hes pretty certain my pain is coming from the S1 joint. He wants to test it out with a SI Block and prove it out. He said if the pain subsides, he would proceed with an RFA of the SI joint. He mentioned doing via an Endoscope to obtain a better result. I mentioned that the CAT Scan showed a finding of “Increased End Plate Sclerosis with Subsidence”. The doctor said that is a normal finding as one ages? I was under the impression that could be from the TLIF procedure and not preparing the surfaces properly? I’m mentally preparing myself for a Revision surgery. Any increased activity causes days of pain and that’s not acceptable. Any inputs from you make this ordeal much more tolerable.
Thanks
Steve
-
AuthorPosts