Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 25 through 30 (of 65 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Hi Dr Corenman

    This is the latest MRI report

    MRI LUMBAR SPINE:

    TECHNIQUE: Sagittal: T1, STIR, T2. Axial: T1, T2 (disc cuts L1-S1). Coronal: T2. Additional coronal STIR imaging of the sacrum was obtained.

    CLINICAL HISTORY: Back pain, prior fusion surgery, assess interval change.

    FINDINGS: Comparison prior lumbar MRI 09/27/16. The lumbar spinal canal is normal in size and configuration. No acute fracture is seen. No intradural abnormalities, bony destructive lesions or paraspinal masses are noted. The distal thoracic spinal cord and conus are normal. No bony or neural anomalies are identified. A small right renal cyst is partially visualized. Coronal imaging of the sacrum and sacroiliac joints is unremarkable.

    L1-2, L2-3: Negative.
    L3-4: Minimal posterior bulging of the disc annulus and mild facet arthropathy is noted. A small left foraminal disc herniation is causing very mild compression of the exiting left L3 root. No significant thecal sac deformity is seen..
    L4-5: The patient has undergone laminectomy, posterior instrumented fusion and interbody fusion. Posterior metallic rods/screws and an anterior disc graft are noted. No herniated disc, spinal stenosis or postop collection is seen.
    L5-S1: A small central and slightly more left-sided broad-based disc herniation is noted, causing mild midline thecal sac compression. Mild foraminal deformity of the exiting left L5 root is also noted.

    Impression:
    1. NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE SINCE THE PRIOR LUMBAR MRI DATED 09/27/16.
    2. SMALL LEFT FORAMINAL DISC HERNIATION, L3-4, CAUSING VERY MILD DEFORMITY OF THE EXITING LEFT L3 ROOT.
    3. PREVIOUS LAMINECTOMY, POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTED FUSION AND INTERBODY FUSION, L4-5, AS SIMILARLY NOTED ON EARLIER IMAGING. POSTERIOR METALLIC RODS/SCREWS AND AN ANTERIOR DISC GRAFT ARE AGAIN DEMONSTRATED. THERE IS EXCELLENT DECOMPRESSION OF THE SPINAL CANAL, WITHOUT NEURAL COMPRESSION OR COLLECTION.
    4. SMALL CENTRAL AND SLIGHTLY MORE LEFT-SIDED DISC HERNIATION, L5-S1, CAUSING MILD MIDLINE THECAL SAC DEFORMITY. MILD FORAMINAL DEFORMITY OF THE EXITING LEFT L5 ROOT IS AGAIN NOTED.

    This is the XRAY of my hip:

    History: Bilateral groin pain for 4 weeks, left more than right, no trauma

    Technique: XR HIP AP AND FROG BILATERAL

    Comparison: 6/24/2014

    Findings:

    The right and left hip joint are congruent. The joint spaces are preserved. The cortical margins are normal.

    There is mild prominence of the anterior femoral head neck junction bilaterally. There is fibrocystic change at the anterior right femoral neck. The acetabular morphology is normal bilaterally.

    There are no osteophytes or erosions. There are no aggressive appearing lytic or blastic lesions. The pubic rami, ilioischial and iliopectineal lines appear normal. The bilateral sacral foraminal lines and sacroiliac joints appear normal.

    Impression:

    There is no evidence of fracture or dislocation or arthritic change in the hips.

    ————————————————————————————————————

    I believe that this will be the last MRI prior to revision surgery. The groin pain continues, Motrin 400MG appears to help along with 1/2 tablet of percoset(lowest dose).

    sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Hi Dr. Corenman

    The surgeon indicated that the L5 disc has severely herniated and unstable. I just went for yet another detailed MRI. Once I receive the results, I will share with you and the forum.

    Thanks

    Steve

    sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Hi Dr Corenman

    Thank you again for your help. He does want to do a fusion. He explained that without the additional fusion, I would be very unstable. He feels that the nerves are compressed and should have been addressed at the first surgery. I have one question, Over the last few months, I am really suffering with bilateral groin pain, worse on the left side. The pain level during an attack is 8-9. The pain throws me down, cannot function. Would you know if this can be a result of my issues?

    Thank you Again… Steve

    sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Hi Dr Corenman

    Just a quick update, I tentatively scheduled my surgery for May 2017. What can I expect with this revision surgery? The surgeon would like to redo the rods and screws, use bone from my hip vs cadaver bone. He is reluctant to remove the Globus Expander cage for fear of injuring the dura. He mentioned that he doesn’t use such a spacer due to this issue. Then he plans on decompressing L5/S1, and removing the L5 Disc since it has degenerated since the last surgery. Typically will my recovery be more intense? Can you suggest ideas to heal better? I simply cannot believe that my first surgery was a failure and i need even more correction.

    Thank You again

    Steven

    sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Hi Dr Corenman

    Its been awhile since I have contributed to the forum. A brief update. Im 27 months post TLIF L4/5 surgery. My primary surgeon finally said that there is no indication of any fusion. The nuclear scan showed activity, leading him to that conclusion. New, and disturbing symptoms, are aching, bilateral front leg pain, piercing groin pain. So severe that it causes me to fall to ground until it passes. My pain doctor indicated issues with the L3 as well as the L5. To say the least I am exhausted and leaning towards the recommended surgery of redoing the L4/5, decompression at the L5 levels. The juries out on the L3, since that is a new development. Any ideas or recommendations? As always thank you for your amazing advice

    Steven

    sperryguy
    Participant
    Post count: 68

    Hi Dr C

    The surgical consult indicated that in my situation, a bone scan was not necessary(as you so accurately explained). Prior CAT SCANS and X-ray Flexion Extensions provided him with all he required to make a diagnosis. Even prior to my detailed exam, he had a good idea what is happening. Again, you nailed it, a pseudoarthrosis. His assessment is as follows:
    1) Questionable Complete Fusion of the Facets Joints
    2) No Fusion within the cage. As a side note , he pointed out that the type of cage that was used was too small(typically used for minimally invasive ) and had a feature that spread once installed. He pointed out that he never uses such a cage since it limits the amount of fusion material placed within the cage. He typically uses a large cage. He also prefers harvesting bone from my hip vs cadaver bone.
    3) The type of TLIF that was performed was minimally invasive where the facet joint was not removed. He felt this contributed to the current issues. As per the doctor, he always removes the joint so he visualize the area.
    4) He mentioned that the Mylegram indicated that I have adjacent level disease at the L5. He mentioned that the facet block injections epidurals worked so well since I have issues at that level.
    5) He requires a new MRI and Flexion Extension (since the old one didn’t show me leaning enough?)

    I was completely blown away by the type of operation that was performed. No idea it was minimally invasive and that the facet joint wasn’t removed. As a layman, it appears I got a “Trim” vs a “Full Haircut”. He felt that the surgery should have included some of the above and if I understood correctly, removing the lamina(?) providing a better view of the nerves that are being squeezed.

    His exam, and analysis took close to 2 hours and he was very through. He offered me two options, both of which are surgical. Option 1 was to clean up the L4 region. Attempting to remove the cage and replace with a larger cage and add fusion material. He would then fuse the L5 region. Option 2 would be as the above mentioned, but expose the area and relieve the pressure on the nerves. He said it is longer surgery and there is more risk. Though he has extensive experience in revision surgeries. He said typically there is a 60-70% success rate but it can certainly be higher.

    Over the last two years (22 months) has been a daunting and frustrating experience. While I felt I did extensive research on this surgery(layman), it appears I was in the dark on what was actually done.

    Dr C, is what i was told reasonable? This surgeon would be the third consult over the last 22 months. He was the first face to face doctor to give me a clear and concise diagnosis(aside from your self). What other questions should I ask? Mentally I am not prepared though logically revision surgery is appears to be the reasonable solution. Is option 2 the better solution or go through the less invasive option? Im so sorry for all the question. My symptoms are getting worse.

    Again..thank you! Steve

Viewing 6 posts - 25 through 30 (of 65 total)