Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Microdisectomy and TLIF #21550
3.) You are also stripping muscle with a microdisctomy as well ?
in reply to: Tri-tanium TLIF cage vs Boomerang #21526Tritanium PL posterior lumbar cage – this is the name of it, was just released march 4. Apparently, the cage is manufactured with a 3D printer. Larger lateral windows on the side to monitor fusion process.
My question is, how can you tell if bone is fusing through windows on the side of the cage ?
I will probably just ask for the boomerang cage, seeems to make more sense with your method in shielding the BMP.
in reply to: Tri-tanium TLIF cage vs Boomerang #21517P.S. – new cage is made out of light titanium and from what I understand is more of a rectangular shape…
in reply to: Tri-tanium TLIF cage vs Boomerang #21515Thank you and sorry to drill down to such detail. I find this interesting. I guess there would seem to be some advantage with fusion if bone can grow out of the sides as well at top and bottom ?
The surgeon does not put BMP in the cage, rather he puts BMP in front of the disc space the same way you do and then packs bone in front of the cage.
Question: Will this tri-tanium cage (even though it is not boomerang shape) still shield the BMP from traveling to the spinal cord ? It would seem like the boomerang shape would do a better job of shielding the BMP.
Will the holes in cage provide benefit to fusion process on the sides ?
Have you every seen one on of these cages I am referring to? I believe it is made by stryker and just came on to the market.
Please let me know your thoughts. the surgeon will use either cage.
in reply to: Biologics for fusion #21490Thank you and just curious,
why would a surgeon elect to use Vitoss vs. BMP ?
in reply to: Biologics for fusion #21486Sorry for all the questions….can you also tell me what Vitoss is ? Is it a form or BMP or how is it different ?
Thank you
-
AuthorPosts