Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • patrick01
    Participant
    Post count: 7

    Thank you Doctor, but what kind of Archer would I be if I couldn’t catch my own arrows?

    patrick01
    Participant
    Post count: 7
    in reply to: MRI results #12221

    Thank you Dr. Corenman for taking the time to discuss my conditions. I have an appointment to visit your clinic in March to discuss this in person and hopefully come up with a satisfactory plan to address my pain.

    Pat

    patrick01
    Participant
    Post count: 7
    in reply to: MRI results #12182

    So if I understand you correctly Dr. Corenman because of the straightening of the spine a lamenoplasty or lamenectomy is out of the question with fusion or without?
    Is the only reasonable option an ACDF to allow space for the chord and help with axial pain?

    Patrick

    patrick01
    Participant
    Post count: 7
    in reply to: MRI results #12180

    Thanks Dr.Corenman
    I have lost confidence with the original Surgeon since visiting your sight. In both instances that I got a surgical recommendation from the Neurosurgeons practice, it was a PA that met with me. I have never met the Surgeon himself. This along with the use of Trabecular metal made me decide to keep looking for a qualified Doc.

    Today I went to the UNM Nuero dept and spoke to the head of Nuero Surgery. His recommendation was different than three other Surgeons. This Doctor suggest a C3-C7 Laminoplasty with a C3-4 fusion. He says the C3-4 fusion is because of movement at that level.

    I can understand the Laminoplasty would help with Myelopothy but I have alot of Axial neck pain as well. My ROM is not great as it is so would a Laminoplasty with fusion be helpful with the Axial pain?

    This doctor has ordered new films for Neutral and Extension which I presume will tell him the extent of straightening of the Lordosis and determine if fusion would be necessary. Any thoughts??

    patrick01
    Participant
    Post count: 7
    in reply to: MRI results #12175

    I believe the spine is stable if i read this report correctly. The Surgeon suggested C3-4 as well because of a comparison to a 2012 MRI that has shown an apparent change to that level. He said it was best to take care of it now instead of going back in again in the future.
    As far as the kyphosis goes I spoke to the Dr. about this and asked if it could be addressed at the time of the fusion to restore the normal Lordosis, he said that it wouldn’t be necessary. I told my wife that didn’t sound correct but I would get another opinion.
    The Trebecular Metal was a new one for me as well! I had experiance with Iliac Crest graft for a prior fusion and had read about allograft but never Trebecular Metal.
    I’m loosing confidence in my choice of a Surgeon so if you have any suggestions for a Dr. in Albuquerque area that would be great other wise I will make an appointment to visit your office.

    Thanks

    CERVICAL SPINE INCLUDING FLEXION/EXTENSION:
    CLINICAL HISTORY: Cervical stenosis.
    -CHNIQUE: X-rays of the cervical spine performed 01/12/15, there is a comparison MRI of the cervical spine report
    from 12/23/14.
    FINDINGS: There are moderately severe degenerative changes in the mid to lower cervical spine with multilevel
    moderate disc space narrowings and anterior osteophytic spurring extending from C4 through T1 .
    There are no compression fractures or prevertebral soft tissue swelling.
    There is minimal fixed posterior subluxation of C3 upon C4, minimal fixed posterior subluxation of C4 upon C5 which are
    likely degenerative disease related.
    The C1-C2 relationship is normal.
    There is mild reversal of the normal cervical lordosis.
    The visualized lungs are normal.
    IMPRESSION:
    1. There are moderately severe multilevel degenerative changes at the mid to lower cervical spine with minimal subtle
    posterior subluxations as detailed above.
    2. Overall these findings are stable when compared to most recent MRI of the cervical spine from 12/23/14

    patrick01
    Participant
    Post count: 7
    in reply to: MRI results #12158

    Hello Dr. Corenman
    Please excuse the long post as this is my first time on your forum.

    I have been treated by a pain specialist here in Albuquerque since 2006 with bilateral RF Ablasions, Epidural Steroid Injections, Cervical Medial branch Blocks and Intraarticular Facet Injections. This treatment was effective at first but the frequency of treatments has increased and the effectivness has decreased.

    Current Medications are Hydrocodone 10-325, Metaxalone 800Mg, & Gabapinton 1800 Mg.

    Physical therapy helped with ROM

    I am post T11-T12 decompression with lamenectomy and Harrington Rods T9-L2 due to a motorcycle accident where I had a head on with a tree suffered a compression Fx.

    This is the most recent MRI

    INDICATION: 55 -year-old male with history of neck pain and cervical spondylolysis. Left upper extrerpity muscle
    spasms with stabbing pain of the left scapula and electric sensation below the left chin extending to the left ear and scalp. Left arm perceived weakness, pain in neck when turn head left or lean head left. Constantly wake up at night due to discomfort.

    ~HNIQUE: Unenhanced MRI of the cervical spine.
    I ..• DINGS: There is moderately severe multilevel degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine C3- 7 with multilevel
    posterior bulging disc osteophyte complexes. No evidence of fracture or metastatic disease.
    Cerebellar tonsils are normally located.
    Multilevel acquired central canal stenosis without appreciable evidence of altered cord caliber or signal intensity on the
    sagittal sequences.
    C2-C3: Unremarkable.
    C3-C4: Bulging disc osteophyte complex with bilateral uncovertebral hypertrophy. There is moderatel severe right and
    mild left neuroforaminal narrowing present with right lateral recess effacement and mild superimposed acquired central
    canal stenosis.
    C4-C5: Bulging disc osteophyte complex with bilateral uncovertebral hypertrophy. Severe right and m~derately severe
    left neuroforaminal narrowing greatest at the neuroforaminal entry zone. Mild to moderate superimposed acquired
    central canal stenosis on the axial images.
    C5-C6: Bulging disc osteophyte complex with bilateral uncovertebral hypertrophy. Moderately severe ilateral
    neuroforaminal stenosis, right greater than left. Mild superimposed acquired central canal stenosis.
    C6-C7: Eccentrically bulging disc osteophyte complex toward the left, with left lateral recess narrowin . Left greater
    than right neuroforaminal entry zone narrowing. Mild superimposed acquired central canal stenosis.
    C7-T1: Mild diffuse disc bulging. Mild bilateral neuroforaminal narrowing. No significant central canal tenosis.
    IMPRESSION:
    1. Multilevel degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine with multilevel acquired central canal stenosis and
    neuroforaminal stenosis. Significant bilateral neuroforaminal stenosis is present. This is worse at the 4-C5 level
    followed by the C5-C6 and C6-C7 levels.

    My question is my Nuerosurgeon is suggesting a 4 level ACDF C3-C7 using Trabecular metal for the graft. Does this oppinion sound reasonable to you and also what is your oppinion of Trabecular metal?

    Thank you Dr. Corenman
    Patrick

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)