Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 13 through 18 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • john123
    Member
    Post count: 30

    Quick question, when reading through a consent form for fusion surgery , I saw that aside from death, paralysis, etc, being the risks of surgery that blindness could occur from spinal surgery or spinal fusion as well?

    I would assume this is a low % however, is this true? Have you ever seen a patient become blind after surgery ? What is the probability that this could happen ?

    Thank you again !

    john123
    Member
    Post count: 30

    Dr. Corenman,

    Thank you so much again for the invaluable information and your meticulous advice !!

    john123
    Member
    Post count: 30

    so to be clear

    1.) stand alone ALIF with interior fixation really should not be done with out pedicle screws for spondylosisthesis with disc hernation at same level due to pars defect ?

    2.) If the ALIF 360 surgery is performed I would be better off with the TLIf as I would only have to retract one nerve root and will have the added stability of a posterolateral fusion ?

    3.) I have heard and read many times that once nerve root(s) are retracted that the retraction can create a life time of painful nerve irritation. Is this common ?

    4.) how do you size and fit the TLIF cage ? Isn’t it trial and error like the ALIF procedure?

    The way my back feels is that there is nothing holding it up in the back, i.e. pars bone; it feel like it is caving in without the brace, therefore I do not see how a stand alone ALIF would hold me up without posterior fixation.

    john123
    Member
    Post count: 30

    “The third problem with an ALIF for an isthmic spondylolisthesis is that there already is a defect in the posterior elements. The ALIF does provide some stability with the screw in cage, but without the stability of the posterior elements (due to the pars fractures-see website), this construct is not as stable as with a posterior approach”

    Thank you always ! Your comment above is where my apprehension lies with just having a stand alone ALIF.

    1.) When you say the construct is not as stable as with the stability of the posterior elements, what does this mean exactly ? Is it fair to say the the TLIF with the posterolateral fusion provides that much more stability with isthmic spondylolisthesis ?

    2.) Also, if I am not having any leg pain, do you still believe it is absolutely necessary to remove pars defect!

    You are correct, my intention is to have one surgery, not having to go back for more.

    john123
    Member
    Post count: 30

    Hi Dr. Corenman:

    I wanted to follow up with you once again regarding the stand alone ALIF. Although you make excellent points regarding TLIF over ALIF, I don’t believe that many surgeons can perform the TLIF as well as others and therefore they choose ALIF because it is an easier and shorter surgery for them. As a matter of fact, most Dr’s that I have consulted with locally have now moved to ALIF for grade one isthmic spondylolisthesis and claim to have very good results vs TLIF.

    1.) They “claim” the surgery is about one hour with one night in the hospital, minimal blood loss and no need for back up pedicle screws.

    2.) They “claim” that if the fusion doesn’t take place that they will bring me back in for minimally invasive pedicle screws, but that rarely happens.

    3.) I am also hearing that all the negative press of BNP with the stand alone ALIF was not true and it is safe to use now.

    4.) They claim at the L5,S1 nerve plexis does not endanger retrograde ejaculation and with a good access surgeon they hardly ever see hernia or digestive issues.

    Most have downplayed TLIF because or nerve irritation and claim there is no need to cut muscle and bone to access the disc space when it can be done minimally invasive through the front.

    What are your thoughts ? This almost sounds too good to be true !

    Thank you

    john123
    Member
    Post count: 30

    Thank you again. I follow your logic but I guess not everyone has the same logic. Again, many surgeons seem very enthused with the ALIF recovery time and the fact that there is no nerve retraction. However, it sounds like the cons of ALIF could far out weigh the pros especially for a male patient…

    “The pars fractures that caused the isthmic spondylolisthesis separates the facets from the entire vertebra. Preserving the facets will not make a difference in stability, but there are detriments to not removing them.”

    “These facets are great bone graft sources and should be used for graft. Not using them again makes absolutely no sense. This graft can make the difference between a solid fusion and no fusion at all. In addition, there is typically a large spur that grows off the bottom of the pedicle of L5 where the fracture originates. This spur compresses the L5 root and can cause compression if the disc is distracted by a intradiscal cage.”

    Questions:

    1.) In a PLIF the pars defect is removed, leaving the facets in tact. The pars defect is used for bone fusion in the two cages and also posterolaterally?

    2.) In a TLIF the entire pars defect is removed along with spinal process and the one facet joint off to the side where my disc herniation is ? OR is the pars defect removed along with both facet joints and tranverse proceses ? This would sound like the entire portion of lower back at L5,S1 is being removed and replaced by interbody and posterolateral fusion ? Are there any bones left behind?

    3.) When you place TLIF cage in, do you leave some of the wall of the disc to hold the cage in ?

    4.) Do you also fill the disc space with BNP to supplement the cage ?

    5.) How long is the recovery in terms of pain meds and returning to normal activity with TLIF ?

    6.) Will patients require the use of oral steriods or IV steriods after surgery to reduce inflammation ?

    Thank you again for sharing your knowledge and expertise!!!

Viewing 6 posts - 13 through 18 (of 27 total)