Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Alex
    Participant
    Post count: 4

    This is just more of a curiosity issue, but if I were to go to a university hospital and schedule a surgery with Doctor A., does this mean that Doctor A. will specifically do the surgery or is it a possibility that he will observe and have a resident do the surgery?

    This isn’t an issue with my recent surgery as the surgeon was not affiliated with a university but I was wondering if that does occur or if it needs to be disclosed in advance that someone else may be involved to some extent in the process.

    Before I had surgery I did read reviews of several surgeons and one review said she she had issues and was asking about what happened and the surgeon replied that he had just been observing but didn’t perform it. Yikes.

    Alex
    Participant
    Post count: 4

    Wow that’s quite interesting to learn about. I didn’t realize also they are under more stress in the lumbar level. I equated a disc replacement to a hip or knee replacement which have been used for quite some time. I can see now the desire for a fusion since it has been utilized for quite some time.

    I will be patient with the process in the meantime. I suppose I will see where things are when I see the surgeon again in 6 weeks. I did call the office and he called me back relatively quick and stated again that it was probably fluid build up and it may take time to resolve. I had another surgery a long time ago and the doctor wouldn’t respond after the surgery unless I had an appointment. He always had an assistant relay his message.

    There was something else I was curious about. I had a surgeon put in this request initially and it was denied by the insurance. His office was impossible to get ahold of anyone and I could never get a call back which is why I just left and went to the second one who did my surgery.

    It was listed as a code CPT 62287

    Decompression procedure, percutaneous, of nucleus pulposus of intervertebral disc, any method utilizing needle based technique to remove disc material under fluoroscopic imaging or other form of indirect visualization, with discography and/or epidural injection(s) at the treated level(s), when performed, single or multiple levels, lumbar.

    Is this not generally acceptable for a procedure? The letter said it was considered experimental.

    Alex
    Participant
    Post count: 4

    Thanks for the response. Given that it is still early I am going to let it run its course for healing first.

    I also had a question regarding fusion vs artificial discs. Does the same risk of adjacent segment disease run the same risk as a fusion? It seems on the surface the artificial disc is a obvious solution to replacing a damaged disc with mobility.

    The surgeon did initially say that the disc was damaged and long term if it continues to be an issue a fusion or artificial disc replacement could be an option.

    The main concern I have esp with a fusion is that it will eventually damage the rest of the discs and become a cascade of future surgeries

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)