Viewing 6 posts - 25 through 30 (of 44 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    1.) Thank you for your explanation regarding the indirect decompression. If I currently have no leg pain or leg symptoms is there any risk to have having the ALIF 360 and not removing the pars fracture ? Once the segment is fused, would the pars fibers still be source of back pain !?

    2.) My confusion is if my surgeon sent me for pars injections to diagnose pain generator and I get pain relief, wouldn’t that then mean that the pars fracture is a source of pain and would need to come out with a TLIF ?

    3.) I would not be getting a posterolateral fusion with ALIF 360 so I am trying to figure out when it would even be recommended for isthmic spondy before a TLIF ? Surgeon says he only uses BMP with TLIF with revision cases not with first time….because of complications and cost to the hospital!

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    Without leg pain, it is unlikely that an ALIF with a posterior instrumented procedure will cause new onset leg pain. Once the level is fused, the pars fractures are immobilized and should not cause pain.

    Yes, the pars fractures are a source of pain but fusing the front of the spine immobilizes the back of the spine which renders the pars fractures non-painful.

    The very old technique of just a posterolateral fusion is really not used anymore in the face of an isthmic spondylolisthesis. This surgeon is obviously uncomfortable with a TLIF and has chosen the ALIF as his go-to procedure for the isthmic spondylolisthesis.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    Thank you.

    1.) what is the benefit of doing a direct decompression vs. an indirect decompression ?

    2.) I have read in some of your other posts that you believe it is necessary to fuse all masses. How important is it to have posterolateral fusion with isthmic spondy ? I will not have posteralteral fusion with ALIF 360

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    A direct decompression will obviously allow direct visualization of the compression and assure an adequate decompression. An indirect decompression (ALIF) opens the disc space and makes more room for the nerve root. This procedure will decompress the nerve root most of the time. There are however some particular bone spurs that can further compress the nerve root with distraction of the disc space. This is why the indirect decompression has less of a success rate than the direct decompression.

    It is not necessary to fuse all potential masses but the more surfaces you fuse, the better the chance of total fusion. This is why a posterolateral fusion along with the ALIF or TLIF is helpful.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    Understood! Thank you again.

    Kind of interesting how many surgeons, (especially the younger surgeons) will tell you that there are no bone spurs 99% of the time and the pars fracture doesn’t need to come out vs. more experienced surgeons such as yourself that say there are always bones spurs that need to be removed.

    1.) What are your thoughts on this discrepancy ?

    2.) If I’m not having leg pain, is it safe to say that I have no bone spurs ?

    3.) I thought I read that 75%-80% of the your weight is carried in the disc space and the rest is posterolaterally. Is this accurate ?

    Thank you !

    Renee123
    Participant
    Post count: 130

    4.) If I’m not having leg pain then what you are saying is if I can stop the movement of the spondylolistheis on my own then I might be able to avoid surgery ? I know its a long shot, but is there is any kind of therapy you can recommend to do this?

    I read somewhere that prolotherpay will strengthen ligaments and tendons and reduce movement. I don’t know if it will allow me to stand up straight again, but could it be worth a shot ?

Viewing 6 posts - 25 through 30 (of 44 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.