Viewing 4 posts - 13 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • koobi336
    Participant
    Post count: 10

    Yes, it was the left side L4/L5

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    Symptoms in the leg are more likely residuals from the nerve root compression or irritation from the repair of the dural leak than arachnoiditis.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    koobi336
    Participant
    Post count: 10

    Hello Dr. Corenman,
    I had another MRI last week since my back pain is continuing. If you wouldn’t mind looking, do the results below tell you any clues about where this continuing pain could be coming from? Also, I believe it confirms that this is not arachnoiditis, correct? Thanks for your continued correspondence and help!

    CLINICAL DATA: 58-year-old male with lumbar back pain radiating to
    the buttock and foot. Left leg numbness. Lumbar surgery in December
    2018 with subsequent surgical repair of pseudomeningocele on
    02/07/2019.

    EXAM:
    MRI LUMBAR SPINE WITHOUT AND WITH CONTRAST

    TECHNIQUE:
    Multiplanar and multiecho pulse sequences of the lumbar spine were
    obtained without and with intravenous contrast.

    CONTRAST: 16mL MULTIHANCE GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE 529 MG/ML IV SOLN

    COMPARISON: 03/06/2019 lumbar MRI, 01/24/2019, and earlier.

    FINDINGS:
    Segmentation: Normal lumbar segmentation designated as on the prior
    studies.

    Alignment: Stable vertebral height and alignment. Mild straightening
    of lower lumbar lordosis. No significant spondylolisthesis.

    Vertebrae: Small chronic endplate Schmorl’s nodes in the lower
    thoracic spine and L1. Bone marrow signal remains normal. No marrow
    edema or evidence of acute osseous abnormality. Intact visible
    sacrum and SI joints.

    Conus medullaris and cauda equina: Conus extends to the L1 level.
    Conus and cauda equina appear normal. No abnormal intradural
    enhancement. Mild posterior dural thickening and enhancement at
    L4-L5 is described below.

    Paraspinal and other soft tissues: Negative visible abdominal
    viscera.

    A quadrilateral shaped residual postoperative fluid collection in
    the left laminectomy space at L4-L5 is further described below, and
    is decreased since 03/06/2019 now encompassing 11 x 18 x 33
    millimeters (AP by transverse by CC) versus 18 x 24 x 40 millimeters
    previously.

    Disc levels:

    T11-T12 through L3-L4 are unchanged and largely unremarkable.

    L4-L5: Sequelae of left laminectomy. The residual laminectomy space
    fluid collection has decreased in size since March. The collection
    appears simple but is mildly rim enhancing, and there is associated
    mild left posterior dural convexity rim enhancement (series 9, image
    34). However, there is no mass effect on the thecal sac, the
    posterior contour which has mildly enlarged since March. No
    surrounding soft tissue edema. A smaller subcutaneous fluid
    collection at the skin incision site has also regressed with trace
    residual (series 6, image 32). Stable other postoperative changes
    tracking from this fluid collection to the skin surface.

    Stable disc desiccation with minor circumferential disc bulge and
    small broad-based central disc protrusion (series 6, image 31).
    Stable mild facet hypertrophy. Capacious thecal sac now at this
    level. No nerve root clumping or thickening. No convincing stenosis.

    L5-S1: Stable and negative.

    IMPRESSION:
    1. Satisfactory postoperative appearance following repair of dural
    leak in February. Decreasing residual small left L4-L5 laminectomy
    space fluid collection with no mass effect on the thecal sac. Mild
    postoperative dural thickening without adverse features; no nerve
    root thickening, clumping, or enhancement.
    2. Stable L4-L5 disc degeneration with small broad-based protrusion.
    No convincing neural impingement.
    3. Other lumbar levels are stable.

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    Your images rule out arachnoiditis and mass effect from seroma or pseudomeningeocele. There are no “smoking guns” noted and no further compression. It seems to be a “matter of time” to allow the root to heal.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
Viewing 4 posts - 13 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.