Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 1674Hillcrest
    Member
    Post count: 2

    Dear Dr. Coreman,

    I’m a 47 year old male who just got diagnosed with a Congenital Cervical Stenosis and 2-4 mm Disc Protrusions in C3/4, C4/5 and C5/6 and mild to moderate foraminal narrowing on C3/4 and C4/5.
    Worst level is C/4/5. Also slight loss of Lordosis, straightening of Cervical Spine

    The disc protrusions are causing all kinds of sypmtoms (tingling in my hands, numbness on one foot, weakness in my legs, some muscle twitches)

    I went to 3 Neurosurgeons to get an opinion on what the best treament would be in my case and of course I got very different opinions.

    Surgeon 1 suggested a posterior approach (laminoplasty)

    Surgeon 2 said that Laminoplasty might not yield good results since I have a slight loss of Lordosis and cord might not move back enough.
    He suggested a Hybrid of ADR in C3/4, Fusion in C4/5 (also to give me back some lordosis) and another ADR in C5/6.

    Surgeon 3 said ADR in patients with Congenital stenosis are not indicated. I asked him why, but didnt get a clear answer. He suggested a 3 Level fusion.

    1. Which of the 3 suggestions makes the most sense to you ?

    2. Why should an ADR not be performed in patients with congenital stenosis if the ADR removes the obstruction (disc) which causes the spinal compression ?

    I also want to leave my options open for later if I need additional surgeries. So my thought was that a laminoplasty is still possible after an ADR but I’m sure not the other way around.

    I’m definitely more confused now after I talked to the NS’s and I need to come up with a plan which way to go.

    Thank you so much !!

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    Congenital cervical stenosis means you were born with a spinal canal that is narrowed. This by itself does not generally cause cord compression. However with the typical degenerative changes that all of us undergo with aging-the combination of a small canal with bone spur and disc bulge compresses the cord.

    This cord compression is magnified by motion. Bending your head backwards (extension) reduces the diameter of the canal by as much as 30%. Most patients who develop myelopathy (dysfunction of the cord) do so by “battering the cord” with motion. This motion is generally produces painless injury as the cord has no nociceptors (pain signalers/receptors).

    The two surgeries designed to decompress from the front are the ACDF and the ADR (artificial disc replacement). The ACDF removes the spurs and bulges and returns the height of the degenerative disc back to “normal”. This procedure indirectly decompresses the back of the canal by this height restoration.

    The ligamentum flavum (which lines the back of the spinal canal) buckles into the canal from degenerative changes which obviously narrows the canal even more. The height restoration of the ACDF from the front stretches this ligamentum flavum and reduces the buckling which opens the canal even more.

    The ADR on the other hand is not designed to really restore height of the vertebral column (which is why these devices cannot be used on a collapsed disc in the first place). The surgery to place the ADR will remove the bulges and spurs that project into the front of the canal. Of course, motion is preserved by the use of these devices which is good and bad.

    The good of course is motion preservation but that comes with a price. These devices can and do fail. If they fail, they are generally easy to revise to an ACDF. Here is the rub. Preserved motion will allow the canal to narrow with extension. If there is too much extension or the body naturally redevelops a spur (motion is the causation of spur formation), this motion can put the cord into compression again.

    The laminoplasty is a good tool to use to decompress the canal. This “takes the roof off the house” to prevent the pincer mechanism from compressing the cord. If you do have kyphosis (the reverse of the normal lordosis that most necks have), the surgery is less successful as the cord can still remain draped across the bone spurs in the front of the neck.

    The problem with the laminoplasty is that the cord does drift back and a small percentage of patients will have a stretch injury to the C5 nerve (C5 is the shortest nerve and has the least amount of stretch capability). This is generally a temporary setback but there are rare permanent C5 root injuries.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    1674Hillcrest
    Member
    Post count: 2

    Dear Dr. Coreman,

    thank you so much for getting back to me. No one I talked to has given me such a comprehensive answer yet and is so knowledgable.

    So do you think a hybrid solution makes sense in my case, since it removes the anterior obstructions, reduces motion in the worst level but leaves motion in the level below ?

    In my MRI report it says that I have a “slight loss of the lordotic curve”. Is this considered to be “Kyposis” and does this exclude me from a laminoplasty ?

    I also try to figure which would be the optimal sequence of surgeries in order to keep as many option open as possible in case I need more sugery in the future.
    I guess a laminoplasty can always be performed after ACDF or ADR but
    can you also do an ACDF or ADR after a laminoplasty ?

    Can I submit my MRI and X-Ray images to you to evaluate them and do
    a consulation with you ? I could send you a dropbox link.

    Thank you so much again for your help !!

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    I cannot predict if a hybrid construction works in your case as every patient has a different need depending upon the specific findings on the imaging.

    A “slight loss of the lordotic curve” does not mean anything to me. Is it a kyphosis? Is it a lordosis but less than is expected? Numbers translate to specifically understanding the imaging. For example; “there is a 20 degree kyphosis from c3 to C7 with an angular kyphosis at C5-6 of 8 degrees” paints a picture that anyone can understand.

    A “straight” spine can still be a candidate for a laminoplasty. If you have no radiculopathy (nerve root compression causing arm pain), then a laminoplasty will decompress the canal without the need for fusion or ADR.

    You can contact the office at (US) 970 476-1100 for information regarding review of your films.

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.