Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Stingmore
    Participant
    Post count: 1

    Hi Dr Corenman
    I have a history of cervical degeneration with fusions at c4/5&6 with myelomalacia. I have just had a ct scan followed by mri, ct shows significant stenosis C3/4 ap dia 6mm.mri scan says no stenosis at these levels which one would be more accurate. Thank you Paul

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    A canal should be 13mm wide. That is 9mm for the cord, 1mm on each side for the dura and 1mm on each side for CSF. A canal that is 6mm wide is by definition stenotic (narrowed). However, if you have myelomalacia (narrowing of the cord due to tract injury dropout), I might be able to understand that in extreme circumstances, canal narrowing to 6mm would not lead to a compressive condition. Does the MRI note at least 1mm of CSF both fore and aft of the cord at the C3-4 level and there is no white signal change of the cord on the T2 images?

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.