Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Hi Dr Corenman
I have a history of cervical degeneration with fusions at c4/5&6 with myelomalacia. I have just had a ct scan followed by mri, ct shows significant stenosis C3/4 ap dia 6mm.mri scan says no stenosis at these levels which one would be more accurate. Thank you Paul
A canal should be 13mm wide. That is 9mm for the cord, 1mm on each side for the dura and 1mm on each side for CSF. A canal that is 6mm wide is by definition stenotic (narrowed). However, if you have myelomalacia (narrowing of the cord due to tract injury dropout), I might be able to understand that in extreme circumstances, canal narrowing to 6mm would not lead to a compressive condition. Does the MRI note at least 1mm of CSF both fore and aft of the cord at the C3-4 level and there is no white signal change of the cord on the T2 images?