Viewing 6 posts - 25 through 30 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    These motion reducing systems are not designed well. They restrict through fixation by the base of the construct-the pedicle screw. This means that the fixation occurs posterior to the facet (where the rod attaches to the screw) which is not natural and places undo pressure on screw fixation. Since the center of rotation is changed to the back of the spine due to the fixation point, the motion is now off and the screw stress can loosen the fixation (the screw cavities in the bone).

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Michaelrch
    Participant
    Post count: 19

    Thanks again for your advice Dr Corenman. I will bear that in mind.

    Re the Neurolysis which I am scheduled for in April, I understand the chances of success are 50-60%. I asked my surgeon if the op could result in worse pain afterwards if the scar comes back worse. He said that it is not likely. He also intends to use Medtronic Medishield (marketed in the US as Oxiplex) and this has a good track record of reducing incindence of adhesions.

    In your experience with your patients, if the neurolysis op does not work, is there a serious chance of the symptoms being significantly worse? Also do you use gel barriers in your practice and if so, how do they work?

    Many thanks again as always
    Michael

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    Medishield is composed of carboxymethylcellulose/polyethylene oxide (CMC/PEO) gel. It is designed to be non-reactive to prevent WBCs and then fibroblasts to migrate to the surgical area and prevent scar. I have not used this material and it might be OK to use. I have one concern and that is that prevention of scar formation is important but if this material also prevents the annular tear (the original hole in the disc) from scarring, this might lead to more recurrent hernations.

    I use AmnioFix®, a composite amniotic tissue membrane minimally manipulated to protect the collagen matrix and its natural properties. This is a “sheet” of material that lies directly on the nerve root to prevent adhesions. Does it work? I have only been back to revisit one nerve root that I have operated on and there were no significant adhesions but this is not an endorsement of Amniofix. The success rate is still 50%.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Michaelrch
    Participant
    Post count: 19

    Many thanks again Dr Corenman

    Re the gel barrier, as I had the microdiscectomy 9 months ago I hope that the tear in the annulus should have scarred over now. The main aim of this next op is to clear the nerve of scar tissue and any debris that is in there but is not clear in the MRI. That said I suppose if the surgeon thinks that he needs to trim a few millimetres of the disc he might do. He does think that the problem is the combination of the fixed nerve and a very small bulge in the disc.

    Re the neurolysis, in your experience is there a significant chance that the symptoms of the scarring after this op will be worse than what I have now?

    I know it’s not a good reference source given the bias and self selecting group of people, but I have read reports on forums of people having an op to remove scar tissue and being in worse pain afterwards. I am hoping that they are not representative and that the gel or barrier can reduce these risks to an acceptable level.

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    If there is continued compression of the nerve root, even by a small disc herniation, the chance of recovery is much greater than 50% with redo decompression. This is because the scar tethers the nerve root preventing it from “moving out of the way” of the new but smaller herniation. Removal of the scar and the herniation should have as high as 85% success rate (depending upon the size of the new HNP).

    Scarring will occur anew and surgery generally does not decrease the scar volume but with the agent your surgeon will use (Medishield) as with the one I use (Amniofix), there is the possibility of reduced scar.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    Michaelrch
    Participant
    Post count: 19

    Dear Dr Corenman
    It has been a while so here is an update on where I am up to. Not great.
    After some discussion the surgeon concluded that the best option would be a dynamic stabilisation, and due some arthritis of the L4-L5 facet joints, he wanted to do S1-L4. So this is what we did in May 2017. After opening me up he found that the facet joints were very enlarged (although this had always been asymptomatic). At first follow up he was very pleased with the placement and fixation of all 6 screws but I was getting leg pain and pain in my lower back. This turned out to be SI joint pain and then pseudo radicular pain from the inflammation. Then I also started getting a similar problem in my left L5S1 facet joint, I have had numerous steroid injections into the SI joint, facet joint and L5 nerve which all help a bit but nothing works for more than a few days. I am mostly bed bound and on 15mg Targin, 600mg Lodine and 4.5mg Lexintanil a day. I am getting pain in my SI joint, fact joint and plenty of nerve pain in the leg after waklking, sitting etc. So all worse than before.

    After discussion with my physio, we have a theory why my recovery is so bad. He has found (and this agrees with past experience) that my whole lumbar spine is VERY VERY stiff. When I was fit and healthy, m6 wife (a yoga teacher) had commented hat when I bent forward to touch my toes, my L5S1 joint was mobile, then my lower back was straight and rigid and would only start arching above L1.
    So my physio’s theory is that because my L4-L1 is completely rigid, then my back is behaving like I am stabilised/fused from S1 up to L1, and maybe even a bit into my thoracic spine. So this is hugely overloading my SI joint and my L5S1 facet joints (due to the slightly changed geometry at that joint after the stabilisation)

    Do you agree that this “natural” stiffness in L4-L1 or even up to T11/T10 could be he reason why I have recovered so badly from the original microdiscectomy and now this stabilisation? Ie after the microdiscectomy the L5S1 was badly overloaded so no amount of physio would allow me to stabilise it with my muscles. Now that S1-L4 is stabilised, then the overloading is going into my SI joint and so that is failing now. Does that make sense? If so, what treatment is possible to relieve this chronic tightness in these other segments?
    If not, what would you suggest I should try?

    My surgeon did previously mutter that fusion might have to be the next step but it strikes me that that could only make things much worse!

    I very much look forward to hearing your advice.
    Many thanks as always
    Michael

    PS the stabilisation system I had installed is this one
    http://www.spinesave.com/system-iv/
    The screws look well placed and integrated so far. There is no sign of loosening on X-rays or CT scans. I have the most flexible rods that should allow up to 50% motion in the joint.

Viewing 6 posts - 25 through 30 (of 33 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.