Viewing 6 posts - 37 through 42 (of 49 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • westie California
    Participant
    Post count: 138

    Good morning Dr. Corenman,

    I meet with a surgeon last night and was told my issues are stemming from Post-laminectomy kyphosis. I’ve developed a deformity that requires surgical intervention (osteotomy). The bigger problem is my spouse say’s no more surgeries. I’ll let you know down the road what was decided. Thanks

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    It might be that a portion of your symptoms are generated from post-laminectomy kyphosis but it would be impossible to know what percentage. It might be 70% in which case surgery would make some sense. But what if it was 40%? Surgery would not be worth it in that case. An osteotomy is a big surgery with risks and prolonged recovery.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    westie California
    Participant
    Post count: 138

    Dr. Corenman,

    I really appreciate your feedback – thank you!

    Your 100% correct, the benefit of an osteotomy, is unknown at this point. My neurosurgeon said he didn’t want to address the neural foraminal stenosis with a posterior procedure, because it would weaken the spine more (I’ve had posterior bilateral medial facetectomies and Foraminotomies at C5, C6 and C7 ) and most of compression is coming from (front) uncovertebral joint’s.

    What I’m confused about is my neurologist and 2 surgeon’s told me that all three ACDF procedure’s left residual bone spurs, which is now part of the fusion and can’t be removed? No one has explained why removal is not possible. In addition, Spondylitic ridging and uncovertebral spurring at C4-5, C5-6 and C6-7 is noted with some progression. Can post laminectomy kyphosis cause movement in these segments? Can an MRI with contrast help explain what’s going on or a flexion extension MRI? Would it make more sense on a redo ACDF’s with placement of wedge shaped allografts to help restore natural cervical lordosis? Just brain storming.

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    Yes, the ACDF approach allows access to the enlarged uncovertebral joints and the decompression of these joints is dependent upon the surgeon’s expertise. Once the fusion takes place, the only ways to open the foramen is to perform an osteotomy (a really big deal) or a posterior foraminotomy (a smaller deal but not unsubstantial). Also, decompression of the roots may not yield the relief results you desire.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
    westie California
    Participant
    Post count: 138

    Thank you so much as always Dr. Corenman!!

    Wishing you a Happy Father’s Day!!!

    westie California
    Participant
    Post count: 138

    I forgot to mention, I’ve also been told that 5 months post T1-T3 fusion is too soon to say procedure was a failure. A reasonable time frame can be to 12 months. Is this an assessment you would agree with? Thanks

Viewing 6 posts - 37 through 42 (of 49 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.