Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • brick
    Participant
    Post count: 1

    Dr. Corenman,
    Good evening sir.
    Hope this finds you well.

    I had neck surgery in 2010 at c5/6 level and all was well 100% fused etc without further issue. I had a wreck in 2014 and the adjacent levels became problematic, however by c5/6 was still without issue.
    In Dec 2015 I had an ACDF with hardware removal of c5/6- since already fused and the adjacent levels c4/5 and c6/7 were in need of repairing.. Thus the c5/6 plate was removed so all 3 levels could be secured with one plate.

    Side note even in the operative report the surgeon mentioned the c5/6 was so well fused he had to rip it off the bone and there was very little scar tissue that he was pleased with that.. So c5/6 should never even be a topic as far as I was concerned it fused in 2011 and that had gone unchanged by all accounts..

    This brings to my question- My surgery December 2015 and my 1 year post Op December 2016 or Jan 2017- where X-rays indicated slow fusing, the doc was concerned with c4/5 level not fusing as well as the c6/7 so he ordered a CT…

    The CT radiology report makes no sense to me at all and Im so overwhelmed having been thru so much Im terrified at my follow up in a couple of weeks, if I hadn’t fused and what will come next..

    Heres what the radiology report says: Evidence of ACDF from C4 to C7 without evidence of hardware failure or loosening. There is straightening of the cervical spine which may be related to positioning and or the cervical fusion.
    “There is partial osseous fusion at c5/6 level, and there is no appreciable osseous fusions present at c4-5 or c6-7..”

    1) What does that mean? Partial Osseous fusion at c5/6? (partial anything makes no sense- I was and have been fused there)?

    2)No appreciable osseous fusion at c4/5 or c6/7??So I am not fusing 1 year later?

    3)What should I surmise of this.
    Thank you so much!!

    Donald Corenman, MD, DC
    Moderator
    Post count: 8660

    Partial osseous fusion is generally a good finding. The graft used has not fully incorporated but has partially incorporated. Many radiologists will give a percentage of fusion but as long as the C5-6 level gave you no problems, you can assume that the fusion was solid enough to not worry about this level.

    You probably will not fuse at the levels above and below this C5-6 level as one year is generally enough time to determine fusion status. Whether to fix these non-fused segments depends upon your current symptoms and X-ray findings. If you have little to no pain and the X-rays (flexion/extension) don’t show significant motion, you do not need to worry about these levels currently. Probably you should be followed about once per year with new X-rays.

    If you have significant ongoing symptoms, you probably need a revision surgery. This might be from the front again (a repeat ACDF with your own bone) or from the back (a posterior fusion) depending upon the symptoms and findings on X-ray and CT scan.

    Dr. Corenman

    PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
     
    Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.