Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32890
Will do Dr. Corenman!
I have a number of things that will be brought up during my sit-down next month with surgeon number 2.
1. I’m onboard with psuedorthosis revision. However I’m still unsure what benefit will be gained from additional instrumentation from C5 thru T3? Why go up that far, why not from C7 or T1? My understanding is hardware is required while your bones fuse, once this process takes place, there’s no requirement? Is there something I’m missing, does hardware help with distribution of pressure on facets after fusion or stability?
2)my other question is after a facetectomy, Laminenctomy, foramenotomy is performed on a segment, to remove bone spurs, if there’s progression of spurs again, isn’t there a way to place instruments into the keyhole again to remove the overgrown spurs, you don’t need to create another keyhole?
I’m sorry to bombard you with these questions and appreciate all your feedback, it’s just that I’ve had so many surgeries, and want to address these issues and put this all behind me. It’s extremely tiring and I’m just so exhausted. I appreciate all that you do. Thank you
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32888Thank you so much Dr. Corenman! Wishing you a great day and stay healthy.
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32884Good morning Dr Corenman,
I had blocks performed in May and June of this year at C3, C5 and C7. All levels were pain generator’s especially C3-C4 left side. What’s ironic that my pain management pointed to is that I’ve had foraiminal stenosis at these levels before all anterior and posterior procedure’s, i.e ACDF, Laminectomies, facetectomies, corpectectomy and not one procedure has removed these multi level compressions.
The bone spurs were never removed during my ACDF’s and as you stated earlier it’s very challenging to perform from a posterior approach. What I’m not sure of is can an anterior micro foramenotomy remove these bone spurs? We know these levels are pain generator’s, per injections and EMG studies, the bigger question is how can it be fixed? Thanks again
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32883Good morning Dr Corenman,
I had blocks performed in May and June of this year at C3, C5 and C7. All levels were pain generator’s especially C3-C4 left side. What’s ironic that my pain management pointed to is that I’ve had foraiminal stenosis at these levels before all anterior and posterior procedure’s, i.e ACDF, Laminectomies, facetectomies, corpectectomy and not one procedure has removed these multi level compressions.
The bone spurs were never removed during my ACDF’s and as you stated earlier it’s very challenging to perform from a posterior approach. What I’m not sure of is can an anterior micro foramenotomy remove these bone spurs? We know these levels are pain generator’s, per injections and EMG studies, the bigger question is how can it be fixed? Thanks again
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32845Good evening Dr. Corenman,
I will be making a decision soon on which surgeon will perform my Pseudarthrosis correction, however I wanted to obtain feedback from you before I proceed. Both surgeons appear reluctant to address any of the foraminal stenosis, especially, C3-4 moderate to severe foraminal stenosis due to uncovertebral bone spurring. First surgeon, was able to convince not to fuse C2-C3, he would perform T1-T2 with my iliac crest bone and two rods. He did inform me that in approximately 5 years, will need fusion extended to T3. Second surgeon stated he would perform Pseudarthrosis correction with bone graft, and extend fusion to T3. He would increase previous screw tracks hole size and place instrumentation from C5 thru T3. He believes that using instrumentation can probably help with kyphosis and stabilization.
If you can share your thoughts on these different approaches it would be highly appreciated and helpful in making my determination. Thanks always in advance
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32838I spoke to NP at surgeon’s office and was told “most of your uncovertebral joints are enlarged due to arthritis”. I was referred to my last MRI that notes:
“C3/4-C6/7 postsurgical changes are noted with anterior fusion plate and anterior fixation screws transversing the C3-C7 vertebral bodies. Graft placement associated with discectomy and fusion procedures are noted at the C3-4, C4-5, C5-6, and C6-7 disc space level. Hypertrophic changes are noted at each level deforming the anterior margin of the thecal sac”. Can enlarged uncovertebral joints encroach on dura and if so can this be a source of pain?
I inquired about C3-4 facetectomy and was told ” due to previous procedures i.e. cervical laminectomies (C3-C7) foraminotomies (C5-C7), and medial facetectomies (C5-C7), it makes no sense to remove more bone, as any additional removal will cause additional weakening and instability. Your spine is already showing signs of weakness, due to fact that you have post laminectomy kyphosis deformity”. Is there any other procedure that can remove bone spurs without removing more bone? doesn’t appear any procedure that involves bone removal will be performed.
-
AuthorPosts