Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Breaking , Resetting Pseudarthrosis Cervical Spine #33143
Dr. Corenman,
Thanks so much! I appreciate your prompt response. Have a great day
in reply to: Breaking , Resetting Pseudarthrosis Cervical Spine #33139Good Morning Dr. Corenman,
At this point all posterior hardware were removed back in 2018. A few months ago, I decided to have a second opinion and it was determined that I have pseudoarthrosis at T1-T2, however the surgeon stated that he does not perform cervicothoracic deformity surgery and is not a deformity specialist. He referred me to another surgeon and mentioned this kind of procedure will require breaking and resetting. The deformity specialist confirmed pseudoarthrosis at T1-T2 and stated he could repair with autograft, rods and screws. My spouse and I were going over procedure and didn’t know why breaking and resetting would be required? The only thing that I could think of was maybe only part of the bone is not fused and is not aligned?
My last follow-up with my neurosurgeon, he never mentioned anything about breaking and resetting. The procedure he described was placing allograft and adding hardware and screws. It sounds like a revision surgery should be straight forward in terms of repairing non union? I also know that I’ve developed post laminectomy kyphosis, so I was thinking if there was some kind of realignment, maybe it would help with kyphosis, sounds like it was just wishful thinking?
in reply to: Breaking , Resetting Pseudarthrosis Cervical Spine #33138Good Morning Dr. Corenman,
At this point all posterior hardware were removed back in 2018. A few months ago, I decided to have a second opinion and it was determined that I have pseudoarthrosis at T1-T2, however the surgeon stated that he does not perform cervicothoracic deformity surgery and is not a deformity specialist. He referred me to another surgeon and mentioned this kind of procedure will require breaking and resetting. The deformity specialist confirmed pseudoarthrosis at T1-T2 and stated he could repair with autograft, rods and screws. My spouse and I were going over procedure and didn’t know why breaking and resetting would be required? The only thing that I could think of was maybe only part of the bone is not fused and is not aligned?
My last follow-up with my neurosurgeon, he never mentioned anything about breaking and resetting. The procedure he described was placing allograft and adding hardware and screws. It sounds like a revision surgery should be straight forward in terms of repairing non union? I also know that I’ve developed post laminectomy kyphosis, so I was thinking if there was some kind of realignment of bone, maybe it would help with kyphosis, sounds like it was just wishful thinking?
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #33118Good Afternoon Dr. Corenman,
Thanks for your continued support, just have a quick question please. My surgeon stated that he can open up nerve channel’s in cervical spine for those levels that are tight. Is this a foraminotomy or something else? Thanks
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #33101Dr. Corenman,
Thank you so much! It is greatly appreciated, stay safe and healthy.
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #33088Good Evening Dr. Corenman,
I spoke earlier to spine surgeon that found my T1-T2 Pseudarthrosis and went over preoperative paperwork and planned procedure. He decided to include T3 and would add hardware from T1. So T1 thru T3 would have a rod on each side. When I mentioned should we include rods from C5 thru T3, he said it was unnecessary due to the fact that 1. your already fused at C5, C6 and C7, why would you add hardware, just to add? it’s a waste of time and money 2. there’s no added benefit 3. adding hardware to fused levels, can increase likelihood of chronic pain from hardware. He would not recommend this at all.
He discussed that a posterior foraminotomy can’t address moderate/severe C3-C4 foraminal stenosis or any other levels at C4-5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 because Spondylitic ridging and uncovertebral spurring are in ACDF fusion, they were never removed during ACDF procedure’s. He’s very confident that addressing Pseudarthrosis will provide a great deal of pain relief and reduction of muscle spasms.
Is there a way to know how much of someone’s pain, and muscle spasms, are caused by uncovertebral spurring verse Pseudarthrosis or there’s overlap? Thanks
-
AuthorPosts