Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32811
Dr. Corenman,
Two quick questions please:
I was told by pain management that C3-C4 is definitely contributing to my pain, however surgeon stated that this segment can’t be treated surgically because “bone spur is inside where you were fused”. Can you explain what is meant by this?
My next question is in reference to my T1-T2 pseudarthrosis. Can this non union improve over time with my anterior partial C7-T1 corpectomy -titanium cage or would a revision procedure with hardware be more appropriate? Thanks always Doctor, hope all is well on your end.
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32725Good evening Dr. Corenman,
I’m sorry for all the questions on proposed C2-C3 posterior fusion surgery. Per my telemedicine consult today, surgeon is stating that C2-C3 requires a fusion due to severe facet degeneration and is contributing to symptoms of base of skull pain, right side occipital headaches, and imbalance. He commented that I have neurological issues with tandem gait i.e. can’t perform heel toe test.
He is reluctant to perform T1-T2 fusion to correct pseudarthrosis since he feels that both issues need to be addressed while he’s in there. I’ve expressed my concerns on additional reduction with my range of motion and he doesn’t seem concerned, stating “some loss can be expected, but you will have at a minimum 50% to 70% improvement in your pain”. From what I can see online most of our range of motion comes from C0-C1, C1-C2, C2-C3. Is this information correct in reference to ROM? I also had a anterior partial corpectomy with titanium cage at C7/T1 back in November, my question is will this help a T1-T2 pseudarthrosis when totally healed? Thanks again
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32711Dr Corenman your the best! We all appreciate everything you do for us. Thanks so much again
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32708Per my reading from others on this forum, C2-C3 base of skull pain and headaches, usually are treated and diagnosed with facet blocks and if one gets relief the next step would be RFA? Surgery at this level is usually reserved for instability, fractures, etc. So for me I think it would be wise just to have The T1-T2 posterior fusion due to pseudoarthrosis? Thanks always in advance
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32703Good Morning Dr Corenman,
That is correct, I do have base of skull pain. I’m not aware of any instability, however I’m told that there’s a large bone spur on facet at this level C2-C3. My last MRI states “at the C2/C3 disc space level, disc herniation is noted deforming the thecal sac abutting the spinal cord contributing to mild central spinal stenosis in conjunction with posterior ligamentous hypertrophy. There is no evidence of neural foraminal stenosis. Loss of disc signal is noted with preservation of disc space height”. Why a fusion is warranted at this level is confusing to me and I’m not willing to lose more range of motion.
I have two opinions at this point, first surgeon wants to perform a revision to T3 (hardware from C5 to T3), the second is revision to T2 (hardware T1 and T2) and C2/C3 fusion (hardware C2/C3). Thanks in advance
in reply to: Posterior foraminotomy of the cervical spine #32698Good evening Dr. Corenman,
I had a consultation today with my surgeon and a flexion-extension x-ray was performed and my CT scan was reviewed. The x-ray showed movement at T1 and T2 and CT scan showed non union. So he wants to perform a fusion revision and add rods and screws at this level posteriorly. In addition he would like to fuse C2/C3 with rods and screws. My question is, how would a C2/C3 impact my range of motion? Thanks
-
AuthorPosts