Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • lilikath00
    Participant
    Post count: 2

    Apologies. Perhaps to provide previous scans may be beneficial:
    Examination: MR C SPINE WO CON – 3221161 – Aug 16 2011 1:18PM
    Accession No: 9793659
    Reason: EVAL FOR MS
    REPORT:
    INDICATION: Chronic pain and intermittent numbness and tingling.
    COMPARISON: MRI brain on 11 2011
    TECHNIQUE: Axial T1 and T2 and sagittal T1, T2, and STIR
    noncontrast MRI of
    the cervical spine .
    FINDINGS: Alignment is within normal limits. Normal bone marrow
    signal. No
    compression deformity. Normal disc signal.
    Cervicomedullary junction is within normal limits. Signal and caliber
    of the
    cervical spinal cord are within normal limits.
    Paraspinal soft tissues are within normal limits.
    The C1-C2 relationship is within normal limits.
    C2-C3: No herniation or stenosis.
    C3-C4: No herniation or stenosis.
    C4-C5: No herniation or stenosis.
    C5-C6: No herniation or stenosis.
    C6-C7: Posterior disc osteophyte complex. Mild central spinal canal
    stenosis.
    C7-T1: No herniation or stenosis.
    IMPRESSION:
    1. C6-C7 mild central spinal canal stenosis.
    2. Normal cord signal.

    2015:
    INDICATION: Chronic neck pain, fibromyalgia, neuropathy, bilateral
    decreased
    sensation of arms and hands, intolerable arm pain, burning and
    tingling,
    TECHNIQUE: Sagittal T1, T2, STIR and axial T1 and T2-weighted
    images of the
    cervical spine were obtained. Following 6 mL intravenous Gadavist
    gadolinium
    repeat sagittal and axial T1-weighted images.
    COMPARISON: MRI cervical spine 8/16/11
    FINDINGS:
    Cervical vertebral alignment has been adequately maintained.
    The craniocervical junction is unremarkable.
    C2-C3: No disc bulge or stenosis.
    C3-C4: No disc bulge or stenosis.
    C4-C5: No disc bulge or stenosis.
    C5-C6: Minimal disc bulge and endplate hypertrophy. Minimal
    stenosis. No
    cord compression.
    C6-C7: Small broad-based right posterior lateral disc protrusion. Mild
    stenosis with minimal if any cord compression/displacement.
    Findings are
    similar to 8/16/11..
    C7-T1: Minimal central bulge without stenosis.
    T1-T2: No disc bulge or stenosis.
    The cervical spinal cord has normal signal. No abnormal intradural
    enhancement.
    IMPRESSION:
    1. C6-C7 small broad-based right posterior lateral disc protrusion
    with mild
    stenosis, minimal if any cord compression and no significant change
    since
    August 2011.
    2. No abnormal signal or abnormal enhancement in the cervical
    spinal cord.

    My other question is is this something, based on the seemingly progressive nature, that i can expect to continue to get worse. Or is it simply case by case and I do my best to mitigate pain and any further injury? I know I was not in a tremendous amount of discomfort prior to being hit in may and the right side of my body is out of whack. Truly would just love a professional set of eyes and a conclusive opinion, in vernacular. Although a scientist, I have a hard time fully comprehending the scans, over the plane of time, and with MVA now in consideration.

    Lastly, I have been experiencing terrible hip pain (almost feels like plantar fasciitis but in my right hip bone). My PT states my hip flexors are terrible and that if i am able to rebuild core strength I should lessen the pain associated with chronic chostochondritis and whiplash. Is the hip pain something i should have checked while working with my neurologist? It recurs intermittently, as does the foot pain, and is miserable in the moment, but tends to subside. No body part is exempt from a twitch, muscle cramp, going numb, or a stabbing sharp pain.

    Again. Thank you so very sincerely. Of the multitudes of doctors i have interacted with, to see your replies, and resulting knowledge means so much to so many of us.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)