Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 7 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Jonesy
    Participant
    Post count: 17

    Thank you again for the fast response!

    I had surgery on 2-1-2016 I am supposed to see assistant again on August 11 and supposed to get another set of x-rays then. So I need to ask about fusion status then. Ok thank you I will. They want to send me to a neurologist for MS testing now because the assistant said what he did so I go in September for that. Can the Myelopathy (blood clot)? In my cord move? Or is it stationary. I am worried about that. Ive read that they can move. I am just frustrated because none of my doctors will explain it like you do. Thank you so much

    Jonesy
    Participant
    Post count: 17

    Oh Thank you for such a quick response! I did have Post Op xrays done 3 months out and this is what it said:
    XR C-Spine 2 or 3 Views –
    NUMBER OF VIEWS: 3
    INDICATION: cervical myelopathy.
    COMPARISON: Cervical spinal radiograph 2/2/2016. Subsequent encounter.

    FINDINGS: The cervical spine is imaged through the level of C7 on sagittal imaging.
    The patient is status post anterior fusion of C4, C5, and C6 with intervertebral disc
    spacing devices. There is slight prominence of the prevertebral soft tissues, decreased
    from earlier postoperative imaging. Findings may be projectional in nature. No acute
    cervical spine compression fracture or acute subluxation is noted. Minimal degenerative
    facet disease is seen.

    IMPRESSION:
    1. Status post anterior fusion of C4, C5, and C6 without evidence of acute cervical spine
    compression fracture or subluxation.
    2. Mild prominence of the prevertebral soft tissues, likely projectional in nature. If high
    clinical suspicion for underlying infection or inflammation, further evaluation with MRI
    could be performed.

    Now on this appointment my surgeon’s assistant (who assisted in the surgery) told me that the x-rays looked great. (from me, a dummy, reading this, it does not sound good)
    He told me that the leg and all the other problems had NOTHING to do with my injury or the surgery. This is when i demanded the 2nd MRI and he said that those results were fine and everything looked normal??? Does this sound at all right from what you have seen? I feel like i am being not told the whole truth about how bad my injury is or how the surgery truley went. they tell me that they can’t even tell me if there was sucess for at least a year and a half, but the surgeon said i am basically good to go. What is the MYELOMALACIA on the second MRI mean? this word really scares me.
    Thank you in advance for your response

    Jonesy
    Participant
    Post count: 17
    in reply to: ACDF SURGERY #22645

    Mine took just over an hour c456

Viewing 3 posts - 7 through 9 (of 9 total)