Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: L5/S1 FUSION NON UNION #10921
Hi Doctor
Here is the rest of the report
Radiology I have reveiwed the bone scan and Ct scan performed recently Bone Scan. This continues to show quite significant uptake at the L5/S1 articulation.Considering it is almost 18 months since his surgery this is likely to correlate with some form of non union at the L5/S1 level It could also be ongoing osteoplastic reaction. There is also uptake at the L4/S1 facet joints.CT scan This was performed in february 2014. There does appear to be some bone integation at the endplates however it is diifficult to see a solid consistent union through the previously performed PLIF fusion. Plan I am of the opion that Mark presents two likely pain generators 1Non union L5/S1 fusion 2.L4/5 facetogenic pain source. I will ask that he have an L4/5 facet joint injection to see if this provides him with some relief. If it doesn’t then I would be more inclined to think that his pain is arising from an L5/S1 non union.in reply to: L5/S1 FUSION NON UNION #10920Hi Doctor
Sorry here is the rest of the surgeon report I accidently sent the other post His presenting profile includes 1. current symptoms. Back pain is the number one issue here .He has pain that radiates into the buttocks .He does get pains down the legs as well,more so on the right than left however the back is the primary problem at the moment. 2. Duration of symptoms Many years 3. Pain score 8/10 4. Background history. He had a work related injury about 15 years ago .At that stage he was working as a printer and lifted a heavy pallet, and had an L5/S1 disc herniation.5. Background surgical history. He had an initial discectomy and follow up nerve root decompression with DR at St. Vincents. He had his fusion performed in late 2012 with DR . 6.His health is otherwise pretty good .He has some high blood pressure but apart from that he is a non smoker. There is no Diabetes.
Examination General appearence .He is a male of stated age who is in obvious discomfort.Lumbar Spine. There are seeral midline incisions consistent with previous spinal operations Lower Limbs He has an absent right ankle reflex and some S1 sensory changes Gait antalgic gait pattern favouring the left leg.Straight leg raise 90 left,70 right5
in reply to: ct scans post fusion surgery #10451Hi Doctor I am writing to you again it has been 14 months post spinal fusion L5/S1 and just been sent for another CT SCAN by my nerosurgion to see if the bone has fused at that level the last time i seen her she said it had started to fuse but it was not a solid fusion doctor I have still got no releif from this surgery my symtoms are lower back pain numbness in my thigh my toes big toes are numb but not all the time also I get a lot pain in both calfs and I sometimes get sharp stabbing pain in the bottom of my foot Doctor I was wondering if I type my CT SCAN results that you would be kind enough to explain them to me I will type the results now
EXAM:CT LUMBAR SPINE
CLINICAL INFORMATION
Follow up following previous L5/S1 fusion
COMPARISON IMAGING:
CT lumbar spine 25/10/2013 at spectrum Imaging.FINDINGS
The previous fusion at L5/S1 with rods and screws and an associated interbody spacer device are noted.The position of the screws remains satisfactory.
Once again, mild scoliosis convex to the left centred at L3 is noted and Schmorl’s nodes at the inferior endplate of L1 and superior endplate of L2
The vertebral body heights are preserved.
The degree of mild diffuse disc bulge and bilateral facet joint arthrosis/hypertrophy at L3/4 is unchanged.There is secondary persistent mild stenosis of the right neural exit foramen.The exiting right L3 nerveroot does not appear impinged
Moderate narrowing of the L5/S1 neural exit foraminae is also again noted. The central canal remains adequate.
CONCLUSION
The spinal hardware remains adequately positioned.
Thank you for referring this patient
Thanks again Doctor for your time and the great service you provide
in reply to: ct scans post fusion surgery #9750Hi Doctor
If possible could you let me know what is the best time to ring one of your nurses about my scans. Also went to see my surgion with my lastest scans and after she viewed them she sent me for a bone scan I was wondering if possible could you explain the report for me please
BONE SCAN +SPECT/CT
A limited bone scanof the lumbar spine,pelvis and hips as well as knees was performed together with a dynamatic study of the lumbar spine.
The dynamic and blood pool studies demonstrate physiological blood flow and blood pooling in the lumbar spine.There was no hyperaemia in the pelvis or hips nor in the knees.
The delayed planar study demonstrates mildly increased isotope uptake atL5/S1.There is equivocally increased isotope uptake involving the left knee.
A SPECT study of the lumbar spine was performed together with a low dose CT scanning for anatomical localisation .There was scan evidence of previous fusion at L5/S1 with rods and screws and associated interbody spacing device.There was moderately increased isotope uptake involving the L5/S1 vertebral bodies.There is moderately increased isotope uptake in relation to the S1 screws bilaterally.There is only equivocally increased isotope uptake in relation to the L5 scews bilaterally.This is slightly more marked on the right than on the left.There were no other focal abnormalities demonstrated
CONCLUSION
1. The previous L5/S1 fusion was noted
2. There is a moderate osteoblastic reaction at L5/S1 vertebral bodies consistent with ongoing discovertebral arthritic change
3. There is a moderate osteoblastic reaction evident in relation to the S1 screws bilaterally. This is of uncertain clinical significance. It may reflect ongoing bony remodelling at the sight of the surgical screws although loosening of the surgical screws cannot be completely excluded.
4.There is a milder osteoblastic reaction in relation to the L5 screws bilaterally and this is slightly more marked on the right. This most likely reflects ongoing bony remodelling in response to the presence of the screws.
5.There were no other significantly active bony abnormalities demonstrated in the lumbar spine.in reply to: ct scans post fusion surgery #9711Hi again doctor so the radiologist has not said whether the bone has fused or not it hadn’t after 6 months but my surgeon said to give it another 3 months sorry for bothering you but still do not feel good in a lot of pain in both calves sharp pain through the bottom of my foot and my lower back just aches I have CDs of my last scans don’t know whether it would be possible to download them on my computer and send them to you I will be honest you seem to be the only person who knows what is going on
Thanks again doctorin reply to: ct scans post fusion surgery #9705Hi Doctor I was wondering if you could explain my latest ct scans the last scans I had said that the bone had not fused as yet that was at the 8 month stage I am now at the 10 month stage so if I type out my report I was wondering if you could explain it to me also I get cd with my scans so I was wondering if I downloaded them whether you would be able to receive them sorry for being a pain just a bit anxious anyway here is the report
Exam CT LUMBAR SPINE
Clinical History ASsessment of L5/S1fusion
Findings:noncontrast multi detector CT scan obtained through the limbo sacral spine. Multiplanar reconstructions performed and viewed on soft tissue and bony windows.dual-energy technique used to minimise artefact arising from metallic hardwareVertebral body heights are preserved.
Evidence of previous fusion at the L5/S1 level with rods and screws with associated interbody spacer device noted. Position of the screws appears satisfactory.there is mild curvature of the lumbar spine,convex to the left centred on the L3 level
Schmorl’s node involving the inferior endplate of the L1 vertebral body noted.
There is mild annular bulging noted at the L3/L4 level. This results in mild right-sided foraminal narrowing. The exiting right L3 nerve root does not appear to be significantly compressed however.
At the L5/S1 level, narrowing of the exit foramina bilaterally due to loss of disc height is noted. Central canal remains adequate.
Conclusion:
Satisfactory position of screws post L5/S1 fusion.
-
AuthorPosts