I’m posting here because of the poster’s comment on the uncertainty of the doctor’s more aggressive diagnosis.
Recently I talked to a physiatrist who defended what I thought to be an aggressive recommendation from a surgeon for three level cervical fusion, C4 to 5, 5 to 6, and 6 to 7. “What your doctor is thinking,” the physiatrist explained, “is pay me now or pay me later.”
The answer brought little comfort, as I had chosen only the C6 to C7 surgery about 14 months ago. But the larger approach had a practical ring I admit. I am aware of adjacent disk syndrome. And on a larger existential plane, all bodies decay. Why not fix the whole engine as long as you’ve got the hood up now?
So the real question is, when cervical disks start going bad (objectively, as seen on the MRI’s) and the surgeon’s already going to work in the neck, could fusing the next two higher vertebra be seen as preventative measure? And what are the stats on single-fusion patients needing more work on adjacent vertebra over time?
According to some forums, man, ACDF is an eighteen month standing appointment. “Then I had this one done, and then that, and then those started to act up.”
Thanks.
(I know that motion is increasingly lost the higher you go. But it is less noticeable near the base of the neck.)
Thanks. What a gift you were in that unwelcome season of ACDF in September of 2011.
there any wisdom fusing the next two discs up from C7?