Donald Corenman, MD, DC
Moderator
Post count: 8660

Generally, bone scan is much more inconclusive than a CT scan for fusion and the MRI STIR image sequences are just as effective as the bone scan for this type of information. This is why I have not used a bone scar in three years.

The bone scan is performed by injection radioactive material that will be absorbed by reproducing bone cells. Therefore, on the bone scan, any area that has significant bone activity will “light up”. This includes a healing fusion as well as a pseudoarthrosis (bone cells are trying to heal with no success).

The CT scan is the gold standard for fusion and I would insist on a 160 slice scanner with 1mm cuts through the questionable area (you only need the scan to go through this post-surgery area and not your entire lumbar spine).

Dr. Corenman

PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
 
Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books.