JBoz
Participant
Post count: 51

Hello Dr. Corenman, I figured it would be better to post the actual report. It was confirmed to be myelomalacia and not fluid build up.

TECHNIQUE: Sagittal T1, T2, STIR and axial T2-weighted images of the thoracic spine were obtained without contrast. 10 cc OptiMARK was given. Postcontrast Tl -weighted axial and sagittal images were obtained.

FINDINGS: There is a smooth physiologic thoracic kyphotic curve. Vertebral heights appear generally maintained. Disc degeneration is mild from T4-5 through T8-9 ar.d at T10-11 .vitfi. dehydration and narrowing. There is a moderate-sized vertebral hemangioma to the right posteriorly at T7. There are laminotomies at T3-4, T4-5 and TS-6. There appears to be a posterior fusion at T4-5, No worrisome marrow replacing lesions are seen. The extraSpinal soft tissues appear normal. These findings appear stable.

T4-5 demonstrates a 2 mm left paramedian broad disc protrusion with a peripheral annular fissure. There is mild spinal cord flattening to the left with stenosis and midline AP canal diameter of 8 mm. No hypertrophic facet DID. No foraminal stenosis. No significant change.

T10-11 demonstrates no significant disc bulge. Facet DJD is mild on the left and mild to moderate on the right. No spinal cord flattening or central stenosis. No foraminal stenosis. No significant change.

The remaining thoracic discs do not show evidence of significant bulge, protrusion, or extrusion.

There is moderate to severe spinal cord edema and/or myelomalacia from mid T4 through mid T5, unchanged. The remainder of the thoracic cord has a smooth contour and is without focal atrophy, edema, or myelomalacia. No mass. Following contrast injection, there is enhancing granulation tissue in association with the laminectomies at T3-4 and T5-6 as well as in the posterior midline soft tissues from T3-4 through T10-11, also consistent with postsurgical granulation tissue. No significant abnormalities of intrathecal contiast enhancement are observed.

IMPRESSION:
1. Disc degeneration is mild from T4-5 through T8-9 and at T10-11; laminotomies at T3-T4, T4-5, and T5-6.

2. T$-5 mild spinal cord flattening to the left with stenosis.

3. Spinal cord edema and/or myelomalcia is moderate to severe from mid T4 through mid T5.

4. Allowing for minor variation in partial volume averaging, no definite interval change is lidentified since April 29th, 2016

I should add there was no fusion, and the surgery was only at the T4-T5 level. I only know there is very little information on myelomalacia, and I wonder if most doctors even know about it. This entire battle with my spine has reduced my quality of life tremendously. I cannot function due to severe pain, in both my chest and now my back. It feels like a spear going through me at times. I did file for disability back when my cervical fusion failed, then I had the posterior fusion to fix that, I’m currently in a rock and a hard place, considering my pain doctor will not treat my thoracic spine, due to these findings above, we waited the 3 months, and there was no improvement. I don’t know how to explain this to others, but the problem is more severe than I can put into words. I ended up worse than I was before taking the risk to do this surgery. It was previously a rare herniated disc, causing severe enough chest pain to take the risk. I wish I had some more hope than just time. I don’t know what a second opinion could do, but I may try and get one. I never thought this would be my situation after surgery.

Do you think most doctors have any knowledge on this condition?

I wonder if you have ever treated a patient with this condition, or would you even touch a patient with this condition?

Thanks Dr. Corenman, you have been of great help to me the past couple years. This is directly copied from my report to this page