-
AuthorPosts
-
I had a c5-c6 cervical disc replacement. The doctor feels great about the placement etc. it’s 10 months later and I still have pain aggravation in the back of my neck. It’s not intense pain just sore and like a 3 level all day every day, more so at night.
Recently saw a pain doctor and got a CT scan. Curious of your thoughts? Results below.
Results:
EXAM: CT CERVICAL SPINE WITHOUT CONTRAST
History: 42-year-old male with cervical radiculopathy. History of prior disc replacement.
Technique: Helical volume acquisition utilizing 2 mm multiplanar reformats. DLP : 179 mGycm
Comparison: None.
Findings: Spine is imaged from level of the sella through T2. AP alignment shows slight anterolisthesis at C4-5. There is reversal of cervical lordosis. An artificial disc is seen at C5-6 without evidence of periprosthetic bone reabsorption or malpositioning. No fracture, lytic, or blastic lesion is evident. To the extent visible paraspinal soft tissues appear normal.
Craniocervical junction, C1-2: Minimal osteoarthritic changes are seen at the dens C1 articulation of doubtful clinical relevance. These levels are otherwise unremarkable.
C2-3, C3-4: No significant degenerative changes are present.
C4-5: Slight disc space narrowing is present. This level is otherwise unremarkable.
C5-6: Artificial disc has been placed. There is minimal left posterolateral endplate hypertrophic change and left-sided uncovertebral hypertrophy without significant foraminal stenosis. No neural impingement is suspected.
C6-7: No significant degenerative changes are apparent.
C7-T1: Hypertrophic facet changes are noted resulting in mild to moderate bilateral foraminal stenosis, slightly greater on the left than the right (5/32). No definite C8 root impingement is evident although clinical correlation is needed.
T1-2: There is moderate disc space narrowing present. No disc protrusion is visible. The neural foramina are patent.
IMPRESSION: CT Cervical Spine Without Contrast
1. Status post C5-6 artificial disc placement. Position and appearance are normal with no evidence of loosening.2. Potentially significant left C8 foraminal stenosis due to facet arthropathy.
3. No other potential neural compromise is identified.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.