-
AuthorPosts
-
Hi everyone. My name is Brian I am 50 years old and had my third fusion surgery in February 17 which included installing a cage at C2-C3. In 2007 I had my first fusion at C5-C6 and in 2010 that hardware was removed and a single plate installed from C4-C7. Wasn’t able to “bounce back” after Feb17 surgery. My pain management doc ordered MRI and strongly suggested a second opinion from a neurosurgeon as all my surgeries were done by the same orthopedic surgeon who is advising every “looks good”. My second opinion included nerve tests and a CT scan. I will post those results in separate post immediately following this post. The second opinion doc spent less than 5 minutes on our first appointment when ordering test then had his secretary call me this morning saying doc thinks only issue could be Feb17 surgery not fusing and wants to wait 6 months for another CT scan to see if any issues.
I have constant pain in the base of my skull, pain/pressure in neck, right shoulder, numbness/pain right arm/outer fingers. Pain move to left side, down back and legs as my activity increases.
Anyway I hope to get some insight from this forum on other people’s experience with continued pain/issues after fusion.
Below is a copy/paste of my latest CT Scan. I have removed my identifying information and the physician’s information.
Patient Copy
Generated on: 25-Aug-2017 13:05
Page: 1
Creation Date : 08/17/2017
Performed At : Mayo Building Jacksonville
Indications : Cervicalgia;neck pain17-Aug-2017 13:31 *** Final ***
Exam: CT Cervical Spine WO/CSTCopy
Impression: Complex anterior cervical fusion is present from C3 through C7,
with stand-alone cervical cage fusion at C3-4 without loosening of hardware
but without evidence of bony bridging across the disc space, and ACDF/anterior
plating from C4 through C7 with solid fusion across the disc spaces at C4-C5
and C5-C6, questionable very minimal anterior bridging at C6-C7, but there is
no evidence of solid bony fusion across the disc space at C6-C7 otherwise.
Please see the discussion below.
Findings: Complex postsurgical changes are present of the cervical spine. At
C3-C4, there is a stand -alone anterior cervical cage fusion at C3-C4 without
evidence of loosening or displacement of this hardware. I do not see evidence
to suggest bony bridging across the disc space at this level. At C4-C5, C5-C6,
and C6-C7, there are further ACDF’s with intervertebral disc spacers, with
anterior plating from C4 through C7. There is solid fusion across the disc
spaces at C4-C5 and C5-C6. There is question of minimal amount of a bony
bridging across the anterior margin of C6-C7 disc space, but I do not see
evidence of a solid bony fusion across the disc space at this level. I do not
This printout was generated through Patient Online Services and was the most current version as of the date and time generated.Copy
Comparisons: Outside MRI of the cervical spine dated June 7, 2017 and outside
cervical spine series on May 25, 2017.Patient Copy
Generated on: 25-Aug-2017 13:05
Page: 2
see evidence to suggest loosening of the hardware or abnormal displacement of
the same.
Adjacent segment degenerative change is present at C2-C3 with slightly
diminished intervertebral disc space and a 2 mm grade 1 degenerative
spondylolisthesis. Minimal anterior subluxation is present at C3-C4.
Additional intervertebral disc space loss is present from C7-T1 through T2-T3
levels. There is expected straightening of the cervical spine from the
surgical findings.
C1-C2: Minimal hypertrophic degenerative changes are present at the
atlantoodontoid junction, otherwise unremarkable.Copy
C3-C4: Mild facet arthropathy is present. There is minimal endplate spur.
C4-C5: Expected postsurgical changes are present with solid interbody fusion.
Mild facet arthropathy is present. Suspect minimal partial ankylosis of the
facets.
C5-C6: Expected surgical changes from solid interbody fusion. There is mild
facet arthropathy. There is minimal partial ankylosis of the facets.
C6-C7: Mild facet arthropathy is present. There is a minimal endplate spur
formation. Uncovertebral hypertrophy is present with mild left-sided neural
foraminal encroachment.
C7-T1: Moderate right and mild left facet arthropathy are present. There is
minimal disc bulge.
T1-T2: Minimal disc bulge is present, otherwise unremarkable.
This printout was generated through Patient Online Services and was the most current version as of the date and time generated.Copy
C2-C3: Mild facet arthropathy is present. There is mild degenerative anterior
subluxation as described above.Patient Copy
Generated on: 25-Aug-2017 13:05
Page: 3
T2-T3: Mild facet arthropathy is present.
Electronically signed by:
17-Aug-2017 13:31Copy
Copy
This printout was generated through Patient Online Services and was the most current version as of the date and time generated.EMG Test pasted below:
Patient CopyGenerated on: 24-Aug-2017 09:13
17-Aug-2017
Study Number: 1Page: 1
Electromyography
Final Report
Referred for: Neck pain
Referral Code:
011 019
314Copy
Nerve conduction studies of both upper limbs were
normal. Concentric needle examination of selected right upper limb and right cervical paraspinal
muscles demonstrated long duration, high amplitude motor unit potentials in the pronator teres
muscle only.
CLINICAL INTERPRETATION: Abnormal study. The findings are most compatible with an old, inactive
right C7 radiculopathy. There is no evidence of an active right cervical radiculopathy or right
upper limb mononeuropathy or left median mononeuropathy on the current study.
E. Dimberg (127 or (78)3-9741)
NERVE CONDUCTIONSTemperature: 34.5 ?C
Record
Rep
Normal
Normal Distal Normal F-Wave F-Wave
Nerve
Type Site
Stim Side Amp Amp
CV CV Lat Lat Lat Est
————————————————————————————————–abductor
pollicis
Median
motor brevis
L 10.8 (> 4.0) 55 (> 48) 3.3 (< 4.5)
This printout was generated through Patient Online Services and was the most current version as of the date and time generated.Copy
SUMMARY: Prior to starting the procedure, the patient’s identity was verified, pertinent available
records were reviewed, the nature of the procedure was explained, the appropriate sites of the
exam were confirmed directly with the patient, and a pre-procedure pause was performed for final
verification of all of the above.Patient Copy
Generated on: 24-Aug-2017 09:13
Median
Ulnar
Median
Median
Ulnar
UlnarPage: 2
abductor
pollicis
motor brevis
abductor
motor digiti minimi
sensory wrist
sensory wrist
sensory wrist
sensory wristR
8.0 (> 4.0) 56 (> 48) 3.5
(< 4.5)
R 11.0 (> 6.0) 63 (> 51) 2.3 (< 3.6)
L 148 (> 50.0) (> 55) 1.7 (< 2.3)
R 109 (> 50.0) 63 (> 55) 1.8 (< 2.3)
L 37 (> 15.0) (> 54) 1.6 (< 2.3)
R 38 (> 15.0) 61 (> 54) 1.7 (< 2.3)NEEDLE EMG
This printout was generated through Patient Online Services and was the most current version as of the date and time generated.
Turns
Copy
Copy
Ins Spont MUP
Recruitment Duration Amplitude Phases
Muscle
Side Act Fib Fasc Normal Activ Reduced Rapid Long Short High Low %
————————————————————————————————–First Dorsal
Interosseous R NL 0 0 NL
Extensor
digitorum
communis
R NL 0 0 NL
Pronator
teres
R NL 0 0
1+
1+
Biceps
brachii
R NL 0 0 NL
Deltoid
R NL 0 0 NL
Triceps
brachii
R NL 0 0 NL
C7 paraspinal R NL 0 0 NL
Patient CopyGenerated on: 24-Aug-2017 09:13
To reiterate your symptoms: “I have constant pain in the base of my skull, pain/pressure in neck, right shoulder, numbness/pain right arm/outer fingers. Pain move to left side, down back and legs as my activity increases”.
To dissect out symptoms, pain at the base of the skull can typically originate from degenerate facets, normally at C2-3 and C3-4 but occasionally at C1-2 (rare). There is noted degenerative facets at C2-3 (“Adjacent segment degenerative change is present at C2-C3 with slightly diminished intervertebral disc space and a 2 mm grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis”). This could be causing your base of neck pain.
Since you have had a fusion at C2-3, please explain the rationale why that level was operated on and how the results went both initially and now. However, there is a discrepancy in your reporting. You note a fusion at C2-3 (“February 17 which included installing a cage at C2-C3” but your CT report notes “anterior cervical fusion is present from C3 through C7, with stand-alone cervical cage fusion at C3-4 without loosening of hardware but without evidence of bony bridging across the disc space”. Did you mean you had a fusion at C3-4?
You have a fusion at C4-7 after an initial fusion at C5-6. What were the reasons and the results after those two surgeries?
Dr. Corenman
PLEASE REMEMBER, THIS FORUM IS MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION ON SPINE ANATOMY, CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS. TO GET AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS, YOU MUST VISIT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IN PERSON.
Donald Corenman, MD, DC is a highly-regarded spine surgeon, considered an expert in the area of neck and back pain. Trained as both a Medical Doctor and Doctor of Chiropractic, Dr. Corenman earned academic appointments as Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and his research on spine surgery and rehabilitation has resulted in the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles and two books. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.